Hyperbole and Understatement
Introduced| English |
|---|
| Hyperbole/haɪˈpɜːbəli/ |
| Understatement/ˌʌndəˈsteɪtmənt/ |
Descriptive words affect the reader
- Descriptive words, such as adjectives and adverbs, qualify or modify the things they describe and affect readers' interaction with the text.
- The second half is the new part: they change how the reader engages, not only what is described.
- So an adjective is doing something to you, not only to the noun.
An adjective can sneak an attitude into a line while pretending it only described the curtains.
Descriptive words qualify what they describe and also...
So an adjective is doing something to you, not only to the noun.
Hyperbole exaggerates
- Hyperbole 夸张 exaggerates, and exaggerating an aspect of an object focuses attention on that trait and conveys a perspective about the object.
- Two effects, both stated: focus, and perspective.
- So a hyperbole tells you what the speaker wants you to look at and how they see it.
Select all the effects the CED gives to exaggerating or minimizing.
Both devices get exactly the same two effects.
Understatement minimizes
- Understatement 低调陈述 minimizes — and the CED gives it exactly the same two effects.
- Minimizing a trait focuses attention on it too, because the reader notices the mismatch.
- It was a difficult year about a catastrophe draws more attention than any adjective could.
Hyperbole, understatement, or proportionate?
Sort each description against what its object would warrant.
Understatement deflects the reader's attention away from the trait.
It focuses attention on it — the reader notices the mismatch.
Understatement draws attention rather than deflecting it. The CED gives minimizing the same two effects as exaggerating — it focuses attention on the trait and conveys a perspective. Reading an understatement as the speaker downplaying something gets the direction of the effect backwards.
Both devices work by ____ against what would have been proportionate.
The distance between the two is the size of the effect.
Both work by mismatch
- Neither device works on its own — each needs the reader to know roughly what would have been proportionate.
- So to analyse either, name what the proportionate description would have been.
- The distance between that and what is written is the size of the effect.
Put the proportion pass in order.
Writing the proportionate version is what makes the effect measurable.
A proportion pass
- Find any description that seems too big or too small for its object.
- Write what a proportionate description would have said.
- Then name the trait now in focus, and the perspective the mismatch conveys.
Of a house burning down: "we were somewhat inconvenienced." A proportionate description would be devastating. The distance is the effect — the trait in focus is the scale of the loss, and the perspective conveyed is a refusal to be seen grieving in public.
Descriptive words qualify what they describe and affect readers' interaction with the text. Hyperbole exaggerates and understatement minimizes, and both focus attention on the trait and convey a perspective. Both work by mismatch, so name what a proportionate description would have been.