Equity and redistribution
| English | Chinese | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| equity | 公平 | gōng píng |
| equality | 平等 | píng děng |
| horizontal equity | 横向公平 | héng xiàng gōng píng |
| vertical equity | 纵向公平 | zòng xiàng gōng píng |
| Lorenz curve | 洛伦兹曲线 | luò lún zī qū xiàn |
| Gini coefficient | 基尼系数 | jī ní xì shù |
| progressive taxes | 累进税 | lèi jìn shuì |
Fair shares?
- Should everyone get the same, or what they earn, or enough to live on? "Fairness" in economics splits into two ideas.
- Governments redistribute to narrow the gap — but every transfer has a cost.
Inequality policy route
Follow how policy can change disposable income and opportunity.
Equity in economics means:
Equity = fairness; equality = the same for everyone. They are not identical.
Taxing those who can afford to pay more is an example of ______ equity.
Vertical equity: the better-off contribute more.
Equity 公平 vs equality 平等
- Equality = everyone gets the same. Equity = what is fair (which may not be equal).
- Horizontal equity 横向公平: treat those in the same situation alike. Vertical equity 纵向公平: those who can pay more, do (progressive tax).

Equality gives everyone the same share; equity gives a fair share, which may not be equal

The Lorenz curve 洛伦兹曲线 and Gini coefficient 基尼系数 measure inequality
A Gini coefficient closer to 1 indicates:
Gini runs 0 (equal) to 1 (one person has everything).
Measuring the gap
- The Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient measure how unequally income is shared (0 = equal, 1 = one person has all).

The more the Lorenz curve bows below the line of equality, the higher the Gini — and the more unequal the distribution.
Bend the Lorenz curve
Drag each economy's top-20% income share. The curve that hugs the line of equality has the lower Gini — and the quintile chips show what that society looks like in numbers.
Heavy redistribution can reduce incentives to work — the equity-efficiency trade-off.
High taxes/benefits can blunt incentives, trading some efficiency for greater equity.
Match each redistribution tool to how it works.
Taxes, transfers and human-capital spending narrow the income gap.
Redistribution and its cost
- Tools: progressive taxes 累进税, benefits/transfers, and spending on health and education.
- The catch: heavy redistribution can blunt incentives to work and invest — the equity-efficiency trade-off.
Equity is not equality. Aiming for perfect equality can be inefficient and is rarely the goal; most policy targets a fairer distribution while preserving incentives.

A minimum wage above equilibrium causes unemployment
You've got it
- equality = the same for all; equity = fair (horizontal + vertical)
- inequality is measured by the Lorenz curve and Gini (0 equal → 1 unequal)
- redistribute with progressive tax + transfers + spending, mindful of the equity-efficiency trade-off