The laissez-faire argument
- Some argued that laissez-faire policies and competition promoted economic growth in the long run, and they opposed government intervention during economic downturns.
- Some argued — the CED reports a position rather than endorsing it, as it did with Manifest Destiny in 5.2.
- In the long run and during economic downturns are the two halves: a claim about time, and a policy about crises.
laissez-faire 입장 양쪽을 모두 선택하시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
시간에 대한 주장과 위기에 대한 정책.
The awkward fact beside it
- 6.2 recorded government subsidies for transportation and communication systems, and 6.6 recorded pro-growth government policies.
- So the same period contains an argument for non-intervention and a record of substantial state support.
- Noticing that gap is the single most useful analytical move in this subtopic.
One economy, four responses: each group diagnosed a different problem and proposed a different remedy
'일부는 주장했다'는 CED가 ...임을 보여줌
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
5.2의engers의 운명(Manifest Destiny)이 그랬던 것처럼 말이다.
Policymakers looked outward too
- Foreign policymakers increasingly looked outside U.S. borders in an effort to gain greater influence and control over markets and natural resources in the Pacific Rim, Asia, and Latin America.
- This is 6.6's business sentence with foreign policymakers substituted, and the CED writes them in parallel on purpose.
- So government was not absent from the economy; it was active where it mattered to the largest firms.
교리, 기록, 아니면 외부로 향한 전환인가?
정부의 경제적 역할 요소들을 분류하시오.
이전 하위 주제에서 두 가지 국가 지원 기록을 모두 선택하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
이론과 기록이 나란히 존재함.
The same period contains an argument for non-intervention and a record of substantial state support. 6.2's government subsidies and 6.6's pro-growth government policies sit beside 6.12's laissez-faire argument — describing that distinction is the most useful move available here.
CED는 사업 문구와 외교 정책 문구를 병행하여 서술합니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
사업계와 정부가 같은 방향을 바라봄.
Continuity and change in government's role
- The objective is continuities and changes in the role of the government in the U.S. economy.
- Continuity: the boundary question 3.9 opened is still being argued, now over regulation and downturns.
- Change: the government now subsidises infrastructure and pursues markets abroad — a larger role than 4.8's internal improvements.
가장 유용한 접근은 이론과 기록 사이의 ____를 설명하는 것입니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
반박할 모순은 아님.
Writing about a doctrine and a record
- State the doctrine as the CED does — some argued — then set the record beside it.
- The strongest sentence: laissez-faire was argued for private production and against relief, while subsidy and diplomacy served the largest firms.
- That is not a contradiction to expose but a distinction to describe, and the CED's parallel sentences invite it.
A government can decline to help a family through a bad winter and, in the same session, grant land and credit to build a railway. Both decisions can be defended on principle; only one of them is described as intervention.
Some argued that laissez-faire policies and competition promoted economic growth in the long run, and they opposed government intervention during economic downturns, while foreign policymakers increasingly looked outside U.S. borders in an effort to gain greater influence and control over markets and natural resources in the Pacific Rim, Asia, and Latin America. Beside these sit 6.2's government subsidies and 6.6's pro-growth government policies — a doctrine and a record, and the distinction between them is the analysis.