IB Diploma Programme Economics HL, Unit 3 Macroeconomics (first assessment
2022). This topic covers syllabus sections 3.1–3.7 in full: measuring
economic activity and illustrating its variations, aggregate demand and
aggregate supply, macroeconomic objectives, the economics of inequality and
poverty, monetary policy, fiscal policy and supply-side policies. One
shared macro model runs through the worked examples — AD $P = 90 - Y/2$
against SRAS $P = 20 + Y/2$, equilibrium $(70, 55)$ — with the multiplier
and CPI arithmetic from the earlier drives, so every number cross-checks.
Must-know for this topic:
Family
Relationship
measuring
GDP by income/expenditure/output; nominal → real via the GDP deflator; the business cycle
AD/AS
AD $= C + I + G + (X - M)$; equilibrium $(70, 55)$; Keynesian vs monetarist AS
interest rates, QE, government spending/taxation; supply-side shifts LRAS
5.2
Measuring economic activity and its variations
Gross domestic product 国内生产总值 (3.1) is the value of all final goods
and services produced within a country in a period — measurable by the
output, income or expenditure approach (they agree in principle). NOMINAL
GDP uses current prices; REAL GDP removes price changes with the GDP
deflator: nominal index 112 with deflator 108 gives real $= \tfrac{112}{108} \times 100 = 103.7$; per head divides by population. GDP PER CAPITA
is a headline welfare proxy with limits (non-market activity, distribution,
environmental damage, price differences), which is why the IB pairs it
with alternative indicators — the Human Development Index, health and
education measures, and (HL) the adjusted net savings measure of
sustainable welfare. The business cycle 经济周期 (also 3.1) illustrates
short-run fluctuations around the trend: recovery → boom → recession →
trough; each stage moves growth, inflation and unemployment together.
Aggregate demand 总需求 (3.2) $= C + I + G + (X - M)$; the components
follow disposable income and confidence (consumption), the interest rate
and expectations (investment), the budget (government spending) and
incomes, exchange rates and world demand (net exports). The AD curve
slopes down with the price level (wealth, interest-rate and trade
effects); a price change MOVES along, a component change SHIFTS. The HL calculation: with $C = 60$, $I = 20$, $G = 20$ and $X - M = 0$, AD $= 100$.
Aggregate supply 总供给: short-run AS rises with the price level; the
LONG run divides the schools — the KEYNESIAN range is flat with spare
capacity then curves up to full employment; the MONETARIST (classical) AS
is vertical at the natural level of output, so demand-side policy moves
only prices. On the shared model AD meets SRAS at $(70, 55)$; a demand
injection shifting AD up 15 gives the new equilibrium $(85, 62.5)$ — more
output AND a higher price level; against a vertical LRAS the same shift
only raises prices. Shifters of LRAS: technology, productivity,
education, labour-force growth, institutional quality.
HL adds the multiplier 乘数: $k = \tfrac{1}{1 - MPC} = \tfrac{1}{MPW}$
where $MPW = MPS + MPT + MPM$. With MPC $= 0.5$, $k = 2$, so a £30bn
injection raises income by £60bn (the SAM anchor from the earlier drive);
with $MPW = 0.5$ the same $k = 2$; with MPC $= 0.8$, $k = 5$ and 20
becomes 100. The crowding-out debate — government spending displacing
private investment — is the standard evaluation.
The objectives (3.3): LOW unemployment 失业 (measured by the ILO definition;
types cyclical, structural, seasonal, frictional, voluntary — the HL
addition being the natural rate and its policy neutrality); LOW AND STABLE inflation 通货膨胀 (the CPI basket: weights 50/30/20 over relatives 110/100/120
gives CPI $= 109$, inflation 9%; demand-pull vs cost-push); EQUITY IN THE
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME (3.4 pairs here — the Lorenz curve and Gini with
the quintile 5/10/15/20/50 calculation of 0.40, absolute vs relative
poverty, and the equity-efficiency trade-off); and (HL extension) HEALTHY
GROWTH and BALANCE OF PAYMENTS STABILITY, with the Phillips-curve
short-run trade-off between unemployment and inflation as the classic
conflict. The losses from deflation and demand-deficient unemployment
quantify the cost of missing the objectives; every objective answer
evaluates the trade-offs among them.
Monetary policy 货币政策 (3.5) is the central bank's management of
interest rates and the money supply: higher rates raise borrowing costs,
cut consumption and investment, cool demand and inflation (and appreciate
the currency). QE adds money when rates are near the zero bound; the
equity of distributional effects is the standard critique. A rate cut
works through the same mechanism in reverse — the SAM India anchor (6.5% →
6.25%) shows a 25-point cut supporting demand.
Fiscal policy 财政政策 (3.6) uses government spending and taxation:
expansionary shifts AD right through the multiplier ($k = 2$ turns £30bn
into £60bn); contractionary does the reverse. The BUDGET balance divides
into the structural deficit (persists at full employment) and the
cyclical deficit (varies with the cycle); automatic stabilisers (taxes
falling, benefits rising in recessions) dampen fluctuations without
discretion, and the balanced-budget multiplier is HL. Debt and deficits
raise crowding-out and intergenerational-equity concerns.
Supply-side policies 供给侧政策 (3.7) shift LRAS right: education and
training, infrastructure, deregulation and privatisation, lower taxes on
work and investment, labour-market reform. On the shared model, LRAS from
85 to 105 along AD cuts the price level from 47.5 to 37.5 while output
RISES — growth with disinflation, the contrast the IB wants drawn against
demand management.
GDP by the three approaches; nominal vs real (112/108 → 103.7); per capita; welfare limits and the alternative indicators; the business cycle's four stages (3.1).
AD = C + I + G + (X − M) with each component's shifter; movements vs shifts (3.2).
SRAS; the Keynesian vs monetarist long run; LRAS shifters (3.2).
The multiplier k = 1/(1−MPC) = 1/MPW; £30bn → £60bn at MPC 0.5; crowding out (3.2 HL).
The objectives: ILO unemployment with its five types and the natural rate; CPI 109 → 9% with both causes; the Phillips trade-off (3.3).
Inequality and poverty: Lorenz/Gini 0.40; absolute vs relative; equity-efficiency (3.4).
Monetary policy: the interest-rate mechanism, QE, distributional critique; the India 6.5 → 6.25 anchor (3.5).
Fiscal policy: the multiplier route; structural vs cyclical deficits; automatic stabilisers; debt concerns (3.6).
Supply-side: the six instruments; LRAS 85 → 105 cutting prices from 47.5 to 37.5 with rising output (3.7).
Boundary notes: HL Paper 3 quantifies the multiplier, deflator and
AD/AS arithmetic above; Paper 1's 25-mark macro essays want a labelled
AD/AS diagram, the transmission mechanism named link by link, and
evaluation of trade-offs and lags — the key concepts change,
interdependence and intervention frame it. All worked numbers are
original or SAM-adapted as labelled.
Supported preparation: Macroeconomic measures and policy
Scope and prerequisites
IB economics first assessment 2022. Three supervised news commentaries cover microeconomics, macroeconomics and the global economy through distinct key concepts. School checks source recency and commentary requirements against the full guide.
Mapped preparation outcomes: ib_economics_hl.5.1, ib_economics_hl.5.2. Read the matching native lesson first. Actual approved choices, evidence and final learner work remain separate.
Source vocabulary
real GDP 实际国内生产总值; aggregate demand 总需求.
Explanation and worked method
Nominal output includes price changes; real output adjusts for prices; per-capita output divides by population. AD combines consumption, investment, government spending and net exports. Expansion can raise output and/or prices depending on spare capacity, expectations and supply conditions. Demand-side and supply-side policies operate through different mechanisms and time horizons.
Task: nominal GDP rises 8%, the GDP deflator rises 5%, and population rises 2%. Estimate real and real-per-capita growth, then qualify a spending stimulus.
Real growth factor=1.08/1.05=1.02857, so real growth≈2.86%. Per-capita real factor=(1.08/1.05)/1.02=1.00840, so growth≈.84%. An approximation of 8−5−2=1% is rougher. A stimulus can shift AD right, increasing output with spare capacity; near capacity, inflation/import leakage may dominate. Consider financing, distribution and supply bottlenecks.
Independent transfer
Real GDP per person increases. Does this establish lower inequality and environmental improvement?
Attempt independently before reading the model.
Checked original model
It is an average output measure, not a distribution or environmental index. Compare income shares, poverty measures and relevant environmental indicators separately. Higher average output may provide resources for improvement but does not establish their use or equal benefit.
These are authored formative expectations, not official IB descriptors. Accept other justified arguments with evidence and material limits.
Source and task holds
This supplement teaches the method for this part of the course. The full assessment criteria and any texts your school chooses come from your teacher.
Interactive lessons on this topic
Work through it step by step, with instant-check exercises.