| English | 의미 |
|---|---|
| Holocaust/ˈhɒləkɔːst/ | 홀로코스트 |
| genocide | 인종灭绝 |
What the CED states
- The rise of extremist groups in power led to the attempted destruction of specific populations, notably the Nazi killing of the Jews in the Holocaust 犹太人大屠杀 during World War II, and to other atrocities, acts of genocide 种族灭绝, or ethnic violence.
- The CED's causal claim is precise: extremist groups in power — the combination of an ideology and a state.
- This subtopic is treated soberly and factually; the historical record is what the exam asks you to know.
CED의 인과 구절은...
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
이데올로기가 국가를 보유할 때 학살이 됨.
The CED's named cases
- Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during and after World War I.
- Cambodia during the late 1970s. Tutsi in Rwanda in the 1990s.
- Ukraine in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s.
CED가 언급한 사례를 모두 선택하시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
1920년대와 1930년대 소비에트 연방의 우크라이나는 CED의 목록을 완성함.
What the cases share
- In each, state power was used against a population defined by identity rather than by any act.
- In each, an existing prejudice was made into policy by a group that had captured a state.
- So the CED's phrase extremist groups in power names the mechanism, and the cases are its instances.
원인, 메커니즘, 아니면 결과?
CED의 해석에 포함된 각 요소를 분류하시오.
각 사례에서 국가 권력은 ____에 의해 정의된 인구에 대해 사용되었으며, 어떤 행위 때문이 아님.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
이것이 이들이 일반 wartime 폭력과 구별되는 점임.
The CED's causal phrase is extremist groups in power, not extremism alone. An ideology becomes an atrocity when it acquires a state — its bureaucracy, its records, its transport and its police. Naming the state capture is what makes an answer explanatory rather than descriptive.
이 수업에서 언급된 모든 결과를 선택하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
관련 사회들의 기억 정치가 목록을 완성함.
Causes and consequences
- The objective asks for the various causes and consequences of mass atrocities in the period from 1900 to the present.
- Causes: extremist ideology, state capture, wartime conditions, and the industrial and bureaucratic capacity described in units 5 and 7.
- Consequences: demographic destruction, refugee movements, postwar legal instruments, and the memory politics of the societies involved.
목표는 여러분에게 이 학살들을 서로 비교하여 ranking하게 함.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
원인과 결과를 요구하며, 정확성이 rubric에서 인정받음.
Writing about this carefully
- Use precise language: name the state, the group targeted, the period, and the mechanism.
- Avoid comparison as ranking — the objective asks for causes and consequences, not for which was worst.
- Accuracy is the respect this material requires, and it is also what the rubric rewards.
Each of the CED's cases involves a state apparatus applied to a population defined by identity: lists, transport, camps or militias organised through official channels. That is why in power is in the sentence — prejudice without state capacity produces violence, and prejudice with it produces the scale the twentieth century recorded.
The rise of extremist groups in power led to the attempted destruction of specific populations, notably the Nazi killing of the Jews in the Holocaust, and to other atrocities, acts of genocide or ethnic violence. The CED's cases: Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, Cambodia in the late 1970s, Tutsi in Rwanda in the 1990s, and Ukraine in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s.