A unilateral policy
- In the years following World War I, the United States pursued a unilateral foreign policy that used international investment, peace treaties, and select military intervention to promote a vision of international order, even while maintaining U.S. isolationism.
- Unilateral and even while maintaining isolationism — the country acted abroad without binding itself to institutions.
- Three instruments: investment, peace treaties, and select military intervention — none of them a permanent alliance.
전간기 정책의 세 수단을 모두 선택하라.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
어느 것도 국가를 제도적으로 묶어두지 않는다.
Concern without action
- In the 1930s, while many Americans were concerned about the rise of fascism and totalitarianism, most opposed taking military action against the aggression of Nazi Germany and Japan until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor drew the United States into World War II.
- Concerned but opposed taking military action — the CED distinguishes an opinion from a policy preference.
- Until... drew the United States into makes entry a response to attack rather than a decision to intervene.
CED는 이 정책이 ... 통해 추구되었음을 말한다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
제도에 구속되지 않고 해외에서 행동함.
The same objective as 7.2
- 7.11 carries Unit 7.B again: the similarities and differences in attitudes about the nation's proper role in the world.
- So the structure learned in 7.2 applies: one position, its opposite, the shared premise, the divergence.
- Similarity: both interwar positions accept action abroad in some form. Difference: whether commitment should be institutional or ad hoc.
수단, 공식적인 태도, 아니면 1930년대의 입장?
전간기 정책의 각 요소를 분류하라
1930년대 대부분의 미국인들은...
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
关切은 정책 선호와 다르다.
Concern is not the same as a policy preference. The CED says many Americans were concerned about the rise of fascism and totalitarianism and yet most opposed taking military action — and entry came only when the Japanese attack drew the United States into the war.
진입은 일본이 진주만 ____ 할 때 이루어졌다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
공격에 대한 대응이지 개입을 위한 결정이 아니었다.
Why this is the pattern of the whole unit
- 7.5: the country entered a European war and then refused the treaty and the League.
- 7.11: it invested, mediated and intervened selectively while calling itself isolationist.
- So involvement without commitment describes both, and naming the pattern is worth more than listing episodes.
7.5와 7.11 전역의 패턴은 가장 잘 ...라고 명명된다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
패턴을 명명하는 것이 에피소드를 나열하는 것보다 더 가치 있다.
Attitudes, compared
- Give the interventionist case and the non-interventionist case as the CED states them, not as later hindsight states them.
- Most opposed taking military action is a majority position with reasons, and 7.2's anti-imperialists supplied several of them.
- End on Pearl Harbor as the CED does: entry came when the choice was removed.
A country can send money, sign treaties, land troops in one place and still describe itself as staying out of the world's quarrels — because it has bound itself to nothing it cannot walk away from.
In the years following World War I, the United States pursued a unilateral foreign policy that used international investment, peace treaties, and select military intervention to promote a vision of international order, even while maintaining U.S. isolationism. In the 1930s, while many Americans were concerned about the rise of fascism and totalitarianism, most opposed taking military action against the aggression of Nazi Germany and Japan until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor drew the United States into World War II. The pattern across 7.5 and 7.11 is involvement without commitment.