IB Diploma Programme Business Management HL, Unit 3 Finance and accounts
(first assessment 2024). This topic covers syllabus sections 3.1–3.9 in
full: the role of finance and its sources, costs and revenues, final
accounts, profitability and liquidity ratio analysis, debt/equity ratio
analysis (HL only), cash flow, investment appraisal, and budgets (HL
only). The worked accounts below belong to the shared repair business in
its second year as a company, so every figure cross-checks.
Must-know for Unit 3:
Family
Content
sources
internal (retained profit, sale of assets, owners' savings) vs external (shares, loans, overdraft, trade credit, leasing, crowdfunding, microfinance, business angels)
final accounts
income statement; statement of financial position; straight-line depreciation
profitability
GPM 40%, profit margin 15%, ROCE 25%
liquidity (HL: gearing)
current 2.0, acid test 1.25; gearing 80%
appraisal
payback 3 yr, ARR 8.3%, NPV $+18\,600$ at 6%
HL budgets
cost and profit centres; variance analysis
3.2
The role of finance and its sources
Finance (3.1) exists to fund CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (non-current assets:
workshops, machines — spent once, used for years) and REVENUE EXPENDITURE
(day-to-day: wages, parts, rent — spent to keep trading). The two must be
matched to the right source: funding a workshop with an overdraft, or
wages with a long loan, is a classic Paper 2 error.
Sources (3.2) divide first by origin. INTERNAL sources need no outsider:
retained profit 留存利润 (free and flexible, but limited by what was
earned), the sale of unwanted assets, and the owners' own savings.
EXTERNAL sources bring outside money: share capital 股本 (permanent,
no repayment, but dilutes ownership — available to companies),
long-term LOAN CAPITAL (large sums with interest and often collateral),
OVERDRAFTS (small, flexible, expensive per pound, repayable on demand),
trade credit 商业信贷 (suppliers' 30–60 days, interest-free but risks a
poor credit reputation), LEASING and hire purchase (use assets without
buying them), CROWDFUNDING (many small sums, often pre-sales),
MICROFINANCE providers (small loans to those excluded from banks) and
BUSINESS ANGELS (investors who also advise, for equity). The choice
weighs cost, control, flexibility, risk, the time period, and the firm's
gearing — a highly geared firm should prefer equity.
Worked example. The second workshop (cost 120 000) was funded half
from retained profit and half from a five-year loan at 8%: the asset
earns over years, so a long-term source fits; the parts bill (45 000 a
month) rides on trade credit; a December wage squeeze uses the overdraft
for eleven days.
Costs and revenues (3.3). A fixed cost 固定成本 does not vary with output
(rent, salaries, depreciation, insurance); a VARIABLE cost does (parts,
piece rates). DIRECT costs attach to a single product or department; INDIRECT
costs (overheads) are shared. Revenue = price × quantity; the repair
business bills 2 000 repairs a month at 25 on average, so 600 000 a year.
Final accounts (3.4). The INCOME STATEMENT (profit and loss) measures
performance over a period: revenue 600 000, cost of sales 360 000, giving
GROSS PROFIT 240 000; expenses 150 000, giving PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 90 000
(before interest and tax, in this simple form). The STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION (balance sheet 资产负债表) photographs the business on one
day: NON-CURRENT ASSETS 320 000 (workshops and equipment
at cost less accumulated depreciation); CURRENT ASSETS 80 000 (inventory
30 000, trade receivables 40 000, cash 10 000); CURRENT LIABILITIES 40 000
(payables 25 000, overdraft 5 000, short-term loan 10 000) — so
working capital 营运资金, current assets minus current liabilities,
is 40 000; NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES 160 000 (the five-year loan); EQUITY 200 000 — and the sheet
always balances: $320\,000 + 80\,000 = 200\,000 + 160\,000 + 40\,000$.
Depreciation 折旧 spreads an asset's cost over its life. Straight-line: a
22 000 diagnostic machine with a 2 000 residual value over four years
costs $(22\,000 - 2\,000)/4 = 5\,000$ a year — charged as an expense and
deducted from the asset's book value. (The units-of-production method
charges by usage instead: the same machine rated for 20 000 diagnoses at
1 per diagnosis.)
Ratios (3.5) read the two statements together. PROFITABILITY: gross
profit margin $= 240\,000 / 600\,000 = 40\%$; profit margin $= 90\,000 / 600\,000 = 15\%$; return on capital employed (ROCE) $= 90\,000 / (320\,000 + 40\,000) = 25\%$ — compare ROCE with the 8% loan rate: the
loan earns its keep. LIQUIDITY: the CURRENT ratio $= 80\,000 / 40\,000 = 2.0$ (a guideline band of 1.5–2); the ACID TEST drops inventory:
$(80\,000 - 30\,000) / 40\,000 = 1.25$. Improving profitability: cost
control, better buying, premium pricing, higher-margin services.
Improving liquidity: sell inventory, collect receivables faster, delay
payables, longer-term finance — each traded against profitability or
supplier goodwill.
HL: the DEBT/EQUITY (gearing) ratio (3.6) $= 160\,000 / 200\,000 = 80\%$.
High gearing magnifies returns to shareholders when ROCE exceeds the
interest rate and magnifies losses when it does not; lenders read it as
risk. A geared firm choosing finance should tilt to equity; income
gearing (interest as a share of profit) is the stress test.
Cash flow (3.7) is NOT profit: profit is revenue matched to costs in the
period; cash is the money actually moving. A profitable business fails if
cash runs out (inventory and receivables absorb cash). Motives for
holding cash: TRANSACTIONARY (day-to-day), PRECAUTIONARY (safety),
SPECULATIVE (opportunities). The cash flow forecast 现金流量预测
tabulates opening cash, cash IN (sales receipts, capital) and cash OUT
(payments) to give closing cash month by month — and is adjusted for
expected changes, not just repeated. Cash-flow problems are treated by
the improvement levers above, by an overdraft, or by emergency cost cuts.
Worked example. March opens with 12 000; receipts 42 000; payments
48 000 → closing 6 000. April opens with 6 000; receipts 44 000;
payments 55 000 (quarterly insurance and the parts bill land together) →
closing $-5\,000$: an overdraft is needed, and the forecast shows it two
months early.
Investment appraisal 投资评估 (3.8) judges a capital project three ways.
The third workshop costs 120 000 and is expected to add NET cash flow of
40 000 a year for four years. PAYBACK $= 120\,000 / 40\,000 = 3$ years —
simple and risk-focused, blind to everything after payback. AVERAGE RATE
OF RETURN: total returns $4 \times 40\,000 - 120\,000 = 40\,000$, so
average annual profit $10\,000$ and ARR $= 10\,000 / 120\,000 = 8.3\%$ —
comparable with the loan rate. NET PRESENT VALUE discounts at the cost of
capital, 6%: the four payments are worth $37\,720 + 35\,600 + 33\,600 + 31\,680 = 138\,600$, so NPV $= +18\,600$ — positive, so the project adds
value that the payback and ARR alone cannot see.
A budget 预算 (3.9, HL only) is a plan expressed in money for a period;
FORECASTS predict what will happen, budgets commit to what should. A COST
CENTRE accumulates its costs (each workshop), a PROFIT CENTRE its revenues
and costs (each workshop plus its front desk). VARIANCE analysis compares
actual with budget: a FAVOURABLE variance beats the budget, an ADVERSE one
misses it; the skill is naming the cause (price or volume; efficiency or
rate) before the remedy. Benefits: coordination, motivation, control,
delegation; limitations: time, rigidity, gaming — budgets serve managers,
not the reverse.
Worked example. Workshop 3 budgets 520 repairs at 25 (13 000) and
delivers 560 at 24 (13 440): a favourable volume variance, an adverse
price variance, and a favourable total — investigate the price cut that
bought the volume before praising either.
Capital vs revenue expenditure; internal vs external sources with each one's cost, control and risk; matching source to time period (3.1–3.2).
Fixed/variable, direct/indirect costs; revenue; the income statement 600 000 → 360 000 → 240 000 → 90 000; the balance sheet balancing at 400 000; straight-line depreciation 5 000 (3.3–3.4).
GPM 40%, profit margin 15%, ROCE 25% vs the 8% loan; current ratio 2.0, acid test 1.25; the improvement levers (3.5).
Gearing 80% with its two-sided reading; equity vs debt choice (3.6 HL).
Profit vs cash; the three motives; the March–April forecast with the $-5\,000$ April (3.7).
Payback 3 yr, ARR 8.3%, NPV $+18\,600$ at 6% — what each can and cannot see (3.8).
Budget vs forecast; cost and profit centres; favourable vs adverse variance with causes (3.9 HL).
Boundary notes: Paper 2 is the quantitative paper — every ratio, the
depreciation, the forecast and all three appraisal methods above are
examinable with a calculator; show the formula, the substitution and the
answer with its sign. Paper 1 asks for sources of finance and cash-flow
strategies evaluated in context. All worked numbers are original on the
shared repair business.
Supported preparation: Cash, finance and appraisal
Scope and prerequisites
IB business management first assessment 2024. Business research project investigates one real organization through a conceptual lens. The toolkit and change, creativity, ethics and sustainability connect units; HL-only topics remain marked.
Mapped preparation outcomes: ib_business_management_hl.3.1, ib_business_management_hl.3.2. Read the matching native lesson first. Actual approved choices, evidence and final learner work remain separate.
Source vocabulary
cash flow 现金流; liquidity 流动性.
Explanation and worked method
Profit records revenue and expenses; cash flow records receipts and payments. A profitable sale on credit may not supply cash today. Match finance duration, cost, control and repayment to the need. Appraisal must state forecast assumptions and uncertainty.
Original case: opening cash 1,500 currency units, receipts 2,800, payments 3,600. Compute closing cash and evaluate paying 900 for equipment immediately.
Net cash flow=receipts−payments=2,800−3,600=−800 units. Closing cash=opening cash+net cash flow=1,500−800=700 units. An immediate 900-unit purchase creates a 200-unit cash gap unless other timings or finance change. Forecast later receipts, consider staged purchase or suitable finance and compare repayment with expected benefits. A positive accounting profit cannot resolve this timing gap.
Independent transfer
Project A repays sooner; project B produces larger later inflows. Is payback sufficient for choosing?
Attempt independently before reading the model.
Checked original model
Payback indicates recovery time and liquidity exposure but ignores later flows and, in its simple form, time value. Compare relevant appraisal measures, forecast reliability, finance and strategic fit. Neither larger total cash nor quicker recovery alone decides every context.
These are authored formative expectations, not official IB descriptors. Accept other justified arguments with evidence and material limits.
Source and task holds
This supplement teaches the method for this part of the course. The full assessment criteria and any texts your school chooses come from your teacher.
Interactive lessons on this topic
Work through it step by step, with instant-check exercises.