| English | 意味 |
|---|---|
| Anglicization/ˌæŋɡlɪsaɪˈzeɪʃn/ | 英国化 |
Pluralism, then two intellectual movements
- The presence of different European religious and ethnic groups contributed to a significant degree of pluralism and intellectual exchange, which were later enhanced by the first Great Awakening and the spread of European Enlightenment ideas.
- The CED gives a base — pluralism from composition — and then two things that enhanced it.
- So the Great Awakening and the Enlightenment are described as amplifiers of an existing openness, not its origin.
大覚醒と啓蒙思想は以下のように記述されている...
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
基礎は構成であり、これらがそれを増幅した。
Anglicisation, by three routes
- The British colonies experienced a gradual Anglicization 英国化 over time, developing autonomous political communities based on English models with influence from intercolonial commercial ties, the emergence of a transatlantic print culture, and the spread of Protestant evangelicalism.
- Note the paradox in the sentence: the communities are autonomous and yet based on English models.
- Three routes are named — commerce, print, and religion — and none of them is government policy.
CEDが列挙するイングリッシュ化の経路をすべて3つ選択せよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
いずれも政府政策ではない。
Interests diverged, and mistrust grew
- The goals and interests of European leaders and colonists at times diverged, leading to a growing mistrust on both sides of the Atlantic.
- Colonists, especially in British North America, expressed dissatisfaction over issues including territorial settlements, frontier defence, self-rule, and trade.
- On both sides again — the CED insists that mistrust was mutual, not a colonial attitude toward a passive Britain.
植民地社会に異議を唱える流れに従う
百年以上にわたって発展してきた自治こそが、1763以降の強化を耐え難くした要因です。
植民者が不満を表明した問題をすべて選択せよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
CEDによると疑念は両方の側で増大した。
Four of the five sources of resistance were supplied by Anglicisation itself. English political models, a transatlantic print culture, Protestant evangelicalism and Enlightenment thought made the colonies more English and gave colonists the standard by which they judged imperial control.
CEDが列挙する植民地の抵抗の源泉をすべて選択せよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
5つの要素のうち4つは、英語化そのものによって提供された。
Five sources of resistance
- Colonists' resistance to imperial control drew on local experiences of self-government, evolving ideas of liberty, the political thought of the Enlightenment, greater religious independence and diversity, and an ideology critical of perceived corruption in the imperial system.
- Five sources, and four of them are things Anglicisation itself supplied — English political models, print, Protestantism, Enlightenment ideas.
- That is why 2.1's second claim holds: the bond and the objection grew from the same soil.
植民地はイギリスのモデルに基づいた____政治共同体を形成していった。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
CED自身の文脈内にあるパラドックス。
Two objectives, one mechanism
- 2.7 asks how movement of people and ideas contributed to American culture and how differing goals affected how colonists viewed themselves and Britain.
- One mechanism answers both: shared institutions and ideas produced both a common culture and a shared standard for judging the empire.
- State that mechanism once, then illustrate it on each side.
Teach a community your law, sell it your books, and share its faith, and you have made it more like you. You have also handed it every phrase it will need when it writes down what you are doing wrong.
Different European religious and ethnic groups contributed to pluralism and intellectual exchange, later enhanced by the first Great Awakening and the spread of European Enlightenment ideas, and the British colonies experienced a gradual Anglicization... developing autonomous political communities based on English models through intercolonial commercial ties, a transatlantic print culture, and Protestant evangelicalism. Goals and interests at times diverged, leading to growing mistrust on both sides, and resistance drew on local experiences of self-government, evolving ideas of liberty, Enlightenment political thought, religious independence and diversity, and an ideology critical of perceived corruption.