| English | 意味 |
|---|---|
| linear relationship/ˈlɪnɪə rɪˈleɪʃənʃɪp/ | 線形関係 |
Interpreting the slope interval
- Read it as: "We're $95\%$ confident the true slope $\beta$ is between the endpoints."
- Translate the slope: predicted change in $y$ per one-unit increase in $x$, in context.
- Positive endpoints → each extra unit of $x$ predicts more $y$; negative → less.
- The interval is a range of plausible values for $\beta$.
Is a linear relationship plausible?
- The key question: is there really a linear relationship 线性关系 between $x$ and $y$?
- "No linear relationship" corresponds exactly to slope $\beta = 0$.
- A flat line ($\beta = 0$) means $x$ doesn't help predict $y$.
- So we ask where the interval sits relative to $0$.
The role of zero
- Interval contains $0$ → a slope of $0$ is plausible → not convincing evidence of a linear relationship.
- Interval entirely above or below $0$ → convincing evidence of a (positive or negative) linear relationship.
- The position of zero decides the claim.
- An all-positive interval also tells you the direction of the association.
Justify the conclusion
- Tie the conclusion to the interval and to zero, in context.
- "Since $(2.1, 6.3)$ is entirely positive, there's convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship."
- Or "Since $(-1.0, 3.4)$ contains $0$, there's no convincing evidence of a linear relationship."
- Phrase it about the population slope and the real variables.
For a slope interval, zero means "no linear relationship." A captured $0$ says a flat line is plausible — so you can not conclude $x$ and $y$ are linearly related. This matches a two-sided $t$-test of $H_0: \beta = 0$. Don't read an interval containing $0$ as proof there's no relationship — it just can't rule a flat slope out.
Two $95\%$ intervals for a slope $\beta$:
- $(2.1,\ 6.3)$: entirely positive → convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship.
- $(-1.0,\ 3.4)$: contains $0$ → no convincing evidence of a linear relationship.
- The captured $0$ flips the conclusion.
A slope interval estimates $\beta$. If it contains $0$, a flat line is plausible — no convincing evidence of a linear relationship; if it's entirely above or below $0$, there is convincing evidence (with direction). Justify the conclusion about the population slope in context.
傾きは0と異なるか?
傾きが0(水平線)ということは、線形関係がないことを意味する。
傾きの95%信頼区間が (2.1, 6.3) である場合、以下のように結論づけられる...
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
信頼区間がすべて正(0より上)である。
傾きの95%信頼区間が (−1.0, 3.4) である場合、以下のように結論づけられる...
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
区間に0が含まれるため、水平な傾きが妥当である。
傾きにおいて「線形関係なし」を表す値は...
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
β = 0 ということは、x が y を予測する役立たないことを意味する。
傾きの区間に0が含まれることは、完全に相関がないことを証明するものではない。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
単に、水平な傾きを除外できないという意味である。
傾き β = 0 は ___ 相関(単一語)に対応する。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
β = 0 ということは、線形関係がないことを意味する。