Аудирование: Разбор практических заданий в классе
TOEFL iBT Тема 3 17:07 Английское озвучивание · Английский + китайские субтитры (встроенные)
Главы
Транскрипт
The Listening section gives you about twenty-nine minutes and about forty-seven items, in four kinds of task: listen and choose a response, listen to a conversation, listen to an announcement, and listen to an academic talk. Every recording is played once. There is no second chance and there is no pause button, though you may take notes on the paper the test centre gives you. The section is adaptive, so what you hear depends on how the earlier items went, which is one more reason not to read difficulty as a verdict on your performance.
The single biggest cause of lost marks in this section is dwelling. A student misses one detail, keeps thinking about it, and misses the next thirty seconds as well. One missed item is one mark. Thirty seconds of not listening is five. So the trained reflex is: let it go and stay with the speaker. Mark the item, choose the best guess now, and return your attention to the recording, because the recording is where every remaining mark lives.
In this task you hear one short turn of speech and choose what would naturally come next. It is a test of everyday conversation, not of academic English, and the right answer is the reply a real person would give. Listen to the function of what was said, not only the words: was it a request, an offer, a complaint, an apology, a suggestion? The reply has to match the function. Intonation carries meaning here too: you're coming to the meeting, with a rising tune, is a question, and the same words falling are a statement. And keep the caution calibrated: an answer that repeats words from the prompt is usually wrong, because natural replies use different words, but repetition alone never decides right or wrong.
Pause and choose. The function is an offer of help, shall I carry it for you, and the reply that fits accepts the offer: thanks, that would help. The painted stairs follow a word from the prompt without responding to the offer. Four sides describes a box, which is not an answer at all. And the next floor repeats a location the word upstairs already implied. Function first, words second.
A conversation is two speakers, often a student and someone at a university, a tutor, a librarian, an office. Track who wants what: one speaker has a problem and the other offers a solution, and most questions sit on that line. An announcement is one speaker giving practical information, a change of room, a deadline, a procedure; listen for what has changed and what the listener must do. In both, a change of direction is signalled before it happens. Actually, but, the thing is, having said that, on second thoughts: a signpost tells you the next sentence matters. And numbers, dates, room names and prices are exactly the details these tasks ask about, so write them down as you hear them. Do not trust your memory for a number.
The academic talk is lecture-style, with one main speaker. Do not try to write everything. Write the shape: the topic, then each new point on its own line, with a dash for the example that supports it. Your notes should look like the talk's outline, not like its transcript. Lecturers signal their structure out loud: today I want to look at, there are three reasons, the first of these, which brings me to, so to summarise. Those phrases are the outline, spoken. Listen for the lecturer's attitude as well as the facts, because surprisingly, of course, and it is often claimed tell you what the speaker thinks, and some questions ask exactly that. And when an example arrives, remember it is there to support a point; if you caught the example but not the point, you hold the less useful half.
Listen once, like the test. Practising with replays trains a skill the test does not measure, so play a recording once and answer, and only then replay it to see what you missed. Shadowing, playing a sentence and saying it back immediately, is a fast way to improve both listening and pronunciation, because it forces you to hear the whole sentence rather than the words you already know. The test uses speakers from North America and elsewhere, so listen to a range on purpose, not only to the accent you find easiest. And fifteen focused minutes a day beats two hours on Sunday, because listening is a habit of attention, and attention is trained by frequency.
Practise taking notes with your hand while your ears keep working. Most students can do either but not both, and the combination is a skill you build in about two weeks. Use abbreviations you already know: arrows for cause and result, plus and minus, initials for long names. Inventing a system on test day costs you the first recording. If you miss an answer, mark the item, choose the best guess now, and move on; there is no penalty for a wrong answer, and a blank scores the same as a wrong one. And watch the everyday tasks: candidates often score well on the academic talk and lose marks on the short conversation, because school listening practice is almost entirely academic.
A student says, I thought the desk stayed open until six. The desk has already closed, and a useful reply explains the hours or offers another way to get help. Repeating the word desk does not make an answer right or wrong; the reply must fit the speaker's meaning and the situation. That is the theme of this practice supplement, which adds original short responses, a conversation, an announcement and an academic talk to the preserved notes. All the scripts, questions and answers are new classroom material, not official E T S items. The printed scripts support teaching and review, and reading them alone does not test listening. For spoken practice, ask a partner to read each script once while you cover it, then record your choices before uncovering it; the lesson audio remains a separate production step.
The supplement's six prompts train the whole-turn judgement. Could I borrow your pen is a request, and yes, here you are accepts it. Sorry I'm late, with the bus stopped for road repairs, is an apology with a reason, and that's all right, we've only just started, accepts it and reassures. I was hoping to use this room, but your group has booked it, states a blocked wish, and we're leaving in five minutes, if you can wait, offers a solution with a condition. The form won't open on my phone is a problem needing another route, and you can use the computer beside the desk provides one. An indirect request can ask for help without saying please help me, and the same sentence in another conversation might simply explain a problem. Decide from grammar, context and the rest of the turn together, and remember both edges of the repetition rule: a repeated word can appear in a suitable response, and a response with all-new words can still be irrelevant.
Pause and choose. The prompt is a suggestion with a condition, if you're free, so the fitting reply accepts and proposes a time: yes, two o'clock works for me. Lunch courses follow the word lunch, a notebook and page counts follow project, and every one of them ignores the conversational job. The distractors in this family are all word-matchers; the answer does the function.
Follow the conversation's line. A student wants to film a short interview on Thursday; the phone records clearly, but it moves when held, so the student asks for a tripod. The assistant's constraint: every full-height tripod is booked, but a small phone stand sits on a table and suits a seated interview. The student agrees, filming at a table in the study room, and asks to collect Thursday morning. Then the correction, marked by actually: the stand comes back from another borrower at two, so collection is from three onwards, with student I D at the equipment desk. The agreement: three works, the interview starts at four, and the stand returns by four on Friday, to the equipment desk, not the library book box. Useful notes read: phone shakes, arrow, table stand; Thursday, collect at or after three, plus I D; Friday, return at or before four, equipment desk.
Question nine asks when the student can collect the stand, and the distractors are a lesson in clock-keeping: two is when the stand returns, three is when collection starts, Thursday morning was the student's first request, and Friday after four is the return deadline. Question eleven asks why the assistant says actually, and the answer is the function of the word: to correct the proposed collection time. It does not cancel the interview, doubt the name, or explain recording. Question ten is student I D, requested directly, and none of the other documents is asked for; do not add a plausible equipment-office rule the script never states. Question eight needs two details joined: tripods are booked, and the seated interview can use a table stand, which is exactly the join the question rewards.
The announcement message for Friday's film evening carries one change and three clocks. The start time is still six, but the event has moved from Room five to Hall B, because Room five needs electrical repairs. Use the north entrance; the east entrance is closed, and the north entrance opens at half past five. If you already reserved a seat, the reservation remains valid and you do not need to book again; arrive by ten to six so staff can check reservations. At ten to six, any reserved seat not claimed becomes available to waiting students, and students without reservations can join the waiting line at the north entrance, which does not guarantee a seat. Separate the three times: entrance opens five thirty, claim deadline five fifty, film starts six o'clock. A number is useful only when attached to the correct action.
Question thirteen asks which arrangement is unchanged, and the word still does the work: the six o'clock start survives, while the room and the entrance changed. Question fourteen combines three details for one action: the new hall, the correct entrance, and the ten-to-six arrival deadline, with the existing reservation still valid, so rebooking adds an unnecessary action. Question fifteen: at ten to six, which is five fifty and not six ten, unclaimed reserved seats are released to waiting students; the distractors invent removal, emptiness and next-Friday saving. Question sixteen asks what an unreserved student can reasonably expect, and the answer keeps the message's strength: a chance of a seat by joining the waiting line, not a guaranteed seat. Strengthening a possibility into a certainty is the classic wrong turn in this task family.
Pause and choose. The announcement says joining the waiting line does not guarantee a seat, and it says unclaimed reservations become available to waiting students at ten to six. So the expectation is a chance of a seat at five fifty, which is exactly the strength of the message: neither despair nor guarantee. The east entrance is closed, the start stays at six, and a guaranteed seat is precisely what the message withheld.
The academic talk compares two classroom-cooling observations, and its opening sentence hands you the outline: today I'll compare two simple observations, then explain what they cannot prove. In the first classroom, staff opened opposite windows when the outside air was cooler than the room; air entered one side and left the other, and the room temperature fell. In the second, windows opened at noon when the outside air was warmer, and the room did not cool, which the speaker carefully limits: this does not mean windows should never open at noon, because outside conditions differ from day to day. Then the caution: different rooms, different groups, and sunlight, people and equipment not kept the same, so the observations are useful examples but do not isolate window arrangement as the only cause. A stronger comparison would check those conditions. Useful notes read: cooler outside plus opposite windows, fall; warmer outside, no cooling; different rooms and groups; sunlight, people, equipment unchecked, stronger comparison needed.
The harder questions reward the attitude listening. The main idea, B, is that cooling decisions depend on conditions and the observations have limits, which is how the talk both opened and closed. The warmer outside air in the second classroom explains why opening windows did not produce the same cooling effect, not a rule about noon. The stronger comparison, question twenty-one, should check other conditions that might affect temperature, and note the boundary: it is proposed, not already established, so the option claiming window arrangement is proven the only cause mistakes an improvement for a result. Takeaway, question twenty-two, means the main lesson here, in this talk's context, though the food meaning exists elsewhere. You do not need extra physics to answer any of these. A causal claim says one factor produced an effect; a confounding factor is another difference that may explain it; here sunlight, people and equipment were not kept the same, and the speaker's cautious attitude appears exactly in those limits.
Pause and choose. The talk cannot isolate window arrangement because the observations differed in more ways than the windows: different rooms, different groups, and unchecked sunlight, numbers of people, and equipment use. Those are confounding factors, other differences that may help explain the result. The talk never claims windows have no effect, the speaker's attitude is cautious rather than hostile, and both observations did open windows. The honest conclusion connects a cooling decision with conditions, rather than following one rule in every room.
After a first attempt, uncover the script and mark the evidence for each answer, then give the error a specific next step. A misheard time becomes a comparison between the spoken phrase and its action. A wrong reply becomes a function identification. An old plan becomes a hunt for the correction and a written final agreement. An over-strong inference becomes a replacement of always or guaranteed with what the evidence supports. A replay after a scored attempt can help diagnose; use it for review, then attempt a different recording once, because repeated listening to one familiar script does not measure transfer to new speech. Shadowing may help some learners, but is not a guaranteed fastest method for everyone. Choose the method that addresses your recorded difficulty, increase difficulty when your answers and reasons improve, and return attention to the current speaker rather than calculating imaginary losses from one missed detail.
Pause and check both. First, no: a reply can repeat a word and still answer the request naturally, so check function and context, not a ban on matching vocabulary. Second, no: students on the waiting line may receive unclaimed seats, but a seat is not guaranteed. The supplement's remaining checks carry the same honesty: two o'clock is the previous borrower's return time, not collection; five thirty, five fifty and six o'clock are three different events; the window talk cannot isolate its cause because rooms, groups and conditions differed; and completing this worksheet by reading certifies nothing about listening — cover the script, have a partner read it once, and check transfer on a fresh recording.