Чтение: аргументы, парные тексты и графические доказательства ⟦number⟧
ACT Тема 25 7:00 Английское озвучивание · Английский + китайские субтитры (встроенные)
Главы
Транскрипт
Integration uses each source for the claim it actually supports. A retrieval-time table can test a claim about speed, but cannot establish historical value or safety.
历史保存与检索便利是不同目标，可以通过旧标签档案和新任务托盘同时兼顾。
Two recommendations may be compatible when they serve different aims.
表格只测检索时间，且稀有组合没有变快。
Read this part of the original context. Retain it for the questions that follow.
阅读这部分完整原创材料，保留其中信息以回答后续问题。
Read this part of the original context. Retain it for the questions that follow.
阅读这部分完整原创材料，保留其中信息以回答后续问题。
Read this part of the original context. Retain it for the questions that follow.
阅读这部分完整原创材料，保留其中信息以回答后续问题。
Read this part of the original context. Retain it for the questions that follow.
阅读这部分完整原创材料，保留其中信息以回答后续问题。
Read this part of the original context. Retain it for the questions that follow.
阅读这部分完整原创材料，保留其中信息以回答后续问题。
Pause here and attempt the task before revealing the reasoning.
请先暂停独立作答，再查看推理。
Use the full context on the preceding pages.
结合前面各页的完整材料。
A protects evidence of earlier categories; B improves task-based retrieval while preserving a size index for rare combinations.
A 保护了早期分类的证据；B 改善了按任务查找的效率，同时为罕见的组合保留了尺寸索引。
Keep a dated record of old labels and changes, provide task trays for frequent combinations, and retain the size index for the remainder.
可以保留一份旧标签和改动的注明日期的记录，为常用组合提供任务托盘，其余部分保留尺寸索引。
This follows both texts without claiming their purposes are identical.
这样同时遵循了两篇文本，又不声称它们的目的完全相同。
Pause here and attempt the task before revealing the reasoning.
请先暂停独立作答，再查看推理。
Use the full context on the preceding pages.
结合前面各页的完整材料。
Frequent kits fall from 8 to 5 minutes, a 3-minute or 37.5% reduction.
常用套件的查找时间从八分钟降到五分钟，减少三分钟，即百分之三十七点五。
Rare kits rise from 10 to 11 minutes, a 1-minute or 10% increase.
罕见套件从十分钟增加到十一分钟，增加一分钟，即百分之十。
The every-search claim is contradicted; averages also do not show every individual trial.
“每一次查找”的说法因此被否定；平均数也不能说明每一次单独的试验。
Pause here and attempt the task before revealing the reasoning.
请先暂停独立作答，再查看推理。
Use the full context on the preceding pages.
结合前面各页的完整材料。
A challenges discarding old labels because it removes historical evidence, but explicitly permits a new index and records of change.
A 反对丢弃旧标签，因为那会抹去历史证据，但明确允许建立新索引并记录变化。
B challenges freezing categories because beginners benefit from task trays, while permitting old labels to be recorded separately.
B 反对把分类冻结不变，因为初学者能从任务托盘中受益，同时允许把旧标签单独记录下来。
Both reject an extreme that erases either usefulness or history.
两者都否定了一种极端：要么抹去实用性，要么抹去历史。
Return to the task and explain why the method fits.
回到题目解释方法为何适用。
Original practice does not predict an official score. Complete required live or recorded evidence separately.
原创练习不预测官方分数；现场或录音证据需另行完成。
Pause and test yourself. Cover the worked answer, rebuild the answer to the last example in your own words, and name one condition that would change it before you check.
暂停一下，自我检测：遮住示范答案，用自己的话重做最后一个例子的答案，并在核对之前说出一个会改变结论的条件。