Rights, development, sustainability and peace
| English | 中文 | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| justice/ˈdʒʌstɪs/ | 正义 | zhèng yì |
| sustainability/səˌsteɪnəˈbɪlɪti/ | 可持续性 | kě chí xù xìng |
A decision you can investigate
- A community resource dispute involves access, livelihood and environmental limits.
- Treating it as only an economic problem can miss questions of rights and authority.
Build the explanation
- Rights and justice 正义 concern entitlements and fair treatment; development and sustainability 可持续性 concern well-being over time.
- Peace is more than the absence of direct violence: institutions and unequal access can sustain tensions.
Match the terms to their precise meanings.
Use these definitions in the particular context of Rights, development, sustainability and peace.
Work through the evidence
- Map the actors' needs and responsibilities. Compare a negotiated access agreement with a restriction imposed without consultation.
- Explain which conditions could make each option durable, fair and enforceable.
What makes a peace agreement more durable in the resource case?
Map the actors' needs and responsibilities. Compare a negotiated access agreement with a restriction imposed without consultation. Explain which conditions could make each option durable, fair and enforceable.
Test the limits
- A single case is not proof that every conflict has the same cause.
- State the relevant concept, evidence and counter-perspective before reaching a judgement.
Which caution belongs to this particular task?
A single case is not proof that every conflict has the same cause. State the relevant concept, evidence and counter-perspective before reaching a judgement.
The explanation in this lesson makes a conditional claim; relevant context and evidence still matter.
State the relevant concept, evidence and counter-perspective before reaching a judgement.
Apply and explain your answer
- What makes a peace agreement more durable in the resource case?
- Credible enforcement and arrangements that address the parties' underlying needs.
Choose the two statements supported by this lesson.
The concept and worked evidence support these claims; the stated limits rule out the universal shortcut.
Use the terms precisely
- justice: Principles and practices of fair treatment.
- sustainability: Maintaining well-being and resources over time.
Map the actors' needs and responsibilities. Compare a negotiated access agreement with a restriction imposed without consultation. Explain which conditions could make each option durable, fair and enforceable.
A single case is not proof that every conflict has the same cause. State the relevant concept, evidence and counter-perspective before reaching a judgement.
Rights and justice concern entitlements and fair treatment; development and sustainability concern well-being over time.