People and society — comparing spoken texts
| English | Chinese | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| audience/ˈɔːdɪəns/ | 听众 | tīng zhòng |
| purpose/ˈpɜːpəs/ | 目的 | mù dì |
| announcement/əˈnaʊnsmənt/ | 通知 | tōng zhī |
| seminar discussion | 研讨讨论 | yán tǎo tǎo lùn |
| evidence/ˈevɪdəns/ | 证据 | zhèng jù |
| speech function | 言语功能 | yán yǔ gōng néng |
| hedge/hedʒ/ | 模糊限制语 | mó hú xiàn zhì yǔ |
| concession/kənˈseʃn/ | 让步 | ràng bù |
| inference/ˈɪnfərəns/ | 推断 | tuī duàn |
| turn-taking/tɜːn ˈteɪkɪŋ/ | 话轮转换 | huà lún zhuàn huàn |
People and society: listen for the job a speaker is doing
The audience 听众 and purpose 目的 change how a speaker talks. A short public announcement 通知 tells people what they can do. A seminar discussion 研讨讨论 tests an idea and its limits. Both may mention the same library tables, but they ask listeners to do different work.
This page uses original written scripts to practise noticing those differences. Reading a script is a useful first step; it does not measure how well you understand speech heard once, or how clearly you speak aloud.
A table can start a conversation. It has not yet learned to chair one.
Two scripts about one place
Script A — library announcement to visitors
“From Friday, the library's conversation corner will open at four each afternoon. We have moved two tables beside the large window. If you would like a quieter time or a different layout, please write a suggestion on the card at the desk. The desk will collect cards until the end of the month.”
Script B — student seminar about the same corner
“Our group observed the corner on four afternoons. Visitors tended to stay longer when the tables faced one another. However, we watched only one library, and we did not record why people stayed. The arrangement might help conversation, but the observation does not prove that it caused longer visits. We should compare several layouts before recommending a permanent change.”
Script A gives a start time and an action for visitors. Script B makes a cautious claim, gives evidence 证据 and explains what the evidence cannot establish. Neither script says the library has already chosen a permanent layout.
What is the main job of Script A?
Script A announces the Friday opening at four and directs visitors to suggestion cards at the desk. The observation and causal question belong to Script B.
Name the speech function, not just the topic
A speech function 言语功能 is what a sentence does in a conversation. In Script A, “will open at four” informs; “please write a suggestion” requests an action. In Script B, “visitors tended to stay longer” reports an observation; “we should compare several layouts” recommends a next step.
The words tended to and might are a hedge 模糊限制语: they leave room for uncertainty. “However” introduces a concession 让步 or limit. Do not turn “might help” into “certainly helps.” A careful speaker is not whispering; the claim is smaller.
| Words you hear or read | Function | What you may safely report |
|---|---|---|
| “From Friday … at four” | inform | the announced start time |
| “please write a suggestion” | request | visitors are invited to suggest a change |
| “might help conversation” | hedge a claim | the effect is possible, not proved |
| “However, we watched only one library” | limit evidence | the observation may not generalise |
In Script B, what does “might help conversation” mean?
“Might” hedges the claim. The group observed one library and did not record why people stayed, so it cannot establish cause.
Match each line to its speech function.
The same topic can contain several functions. Look at what the sentence asks the listener to understand or do.
Main point, support, limit
For an academic spoken text, make three quick notes: claim → support → limit. Script B's claim is that facing tables might help conversation. Its support is an observation over four afternoons. Its limit is that the group watched one library and did not record visitors' reasons. This keeps you from drawing a stronger inference 推断 than the speaker permits.
An announcement needs a different note: when → where → action. Script A says Friday, four o'clock, the window-side corner, and suggestion cards at the desk. If you are asked what visitors should do, the four-o'clock opening is background; the card is the answer.
For a rehearsal, read one script aloud to a partner while they take only these three-part notes. Swap roles and compare the notes with the printed text. A real listening assessment also tests delivery and one-pass comprehension, which this text exercise cannot reproduce.
Script B proves that facing the tables together caused visitors to stay longer.
The group saw an association, but did not record visitors’ reasons. Script B explicitly says the observation does not prove cause.
Put the three note headings for an academic spoken claim in the taught order.
Claim → support → limit keeps the speaker’s meaning and uncertainty together.
Move a discussion forward
Good turn-taking 话轮转换 shows you heard the previous speaker. Suppose a classmate says, “The tables should always face one another because people stayed longer.” Try this response:
“The longer visits are interesting, but the group did not ask visitors why they stayed. Could we try both layouts for a week and ask visitors which one helped them talk?”
The response acknowledges the observation, names its limit, and asks a question that the group can investigate. It neither dismisses the classmate nor pretends the four afternoons proved a cause.
Now say your own twenty-second reply aloud. Record it locally if you can, and check whether your question invites an answer. The typed checks below test your reading of these scripts; they do not grade your voice or pronunciation.
Which reply best moves the table-layout discussion forward?
The second reply acknowledges the observation, keeps its limit and proposes a check. Script B does not say everyone stayed longer or establish cause.