| English | 의미 |
|---|---|
| superpowers | 초강대국 |
| Cold War/kəʊld wɔː/ | 냉전 |
| Non-Aligned Movement/nɒn əˈlaɪnd ˈmuːvmənt/ | 비동맹 운동 |
Two superpowers 超级大国, two systems
- The global balance of economic and political power shifted during and after World War II and rapidly evolved into the Cold War 冷战.
- The democracy of the United States and the authoritarian communist Soviet Union emerged as superpowers.
- Which led to ideological conflict and a power struggle between capitalism and communism across the globe.
CED는 두 초강대국을 다음과 같이 묘사합니다...
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
CED의 서술은 정확하므로 그대로 인용할 가치가 있습니다.
A struggle that was everywhere
- The CED writes across the globe, and it means it: the conflict shaped decisions in states that had no part in its origins.
- A newly independent state choosing an economic model was choosing a patron whether it wanted one or not.
- That is why decolonisation and the Cold War cannot be told separately.
CED에서 언급한 비정립운동 인물들을 모두 선택하시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
나머지 두 사람은 7.7의 제2차 세계대전 지도자들입니다.
A third position
- Groups and individuals, including the Non-Aligned Movement 不结盟运动, opposed and promoted alternatives to the existing economic, political and social orders.
- The CED names Sukarno in Indonesia and Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana.
- Non-alignment is not neutrality by default — it is an active project of refusing to be a client of either superpower.
경쟁이 어떤 형태를 띠는지 관찰하기
냉전은 직접적인 전쟁으로 발전하지 않는 경쟁이므로, 그 대신 구축된 것이 바로 content입니다.
비정립은 단순히 입장의 부재였습니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
CED는 이를 반대하고 대안을 장려한 집단列表中에 포함시킵니다.
Non-alignment was an active position, not an absence of one. The CED lists the Non-Aligned Movement among groups that opposed and promoted alternatives to the existing orders — refusing both patrons required organisation, diplomacy and a development plan of its own.
답변은 단지 반대한 것뿐만 아니라 각 측이 ____was thing을 말해야 합니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
각 측은 안보 보장뿐만 아니라 발전 모델도 제공했습니다.
Ideological conflict has content
- The struggle was between capitalism and communism, and each side offered a model of development as well as a security guarantee.
- For a state deciding how to industrialise, that made the choice practical rather than merely doctrinal.
- So an answer should say what each side was offering, not only what each side opposed.
CED의 "across the globe"라는 표현은 분쟁이 ...임을 의미합니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
그래서 탈식민화와 냉전은 분리하여 이야기할 수 없습니다.
Causes and effects of an ideological struggle
- Causes: a shifted balance of power leaving two states far stronger than the rest, and two incompatible models of how a society should be organised.
- Effects: alliances, proxy wars, nuclear proliferation (8.3), and pressure on every new state to choose (8.5, 8.6).
- The Non-Aligned Movement is the clearest evidence that the pressure to choose was real.
A state that has just become independent needs capital, machinery and an army. Both superpowers will supply all three, on terms. Non-alignment means trying to obtain them without accepting either set of terms — which is harder than joining a bloc, and is why it needed a movement rather than a policy.
The global balance of power shifted during and after World War II and rapidly evolved into the Cold War, with the democracy of the United States and the authoritarian communist Soviet Union as superpowers, producing ideological conflict and a power struggle between capitalism and communism across the globe. The Non-Aligned Movement opposed and promoted alternatives — Sukarno in Indonesia, Nkrumah in Ghana.