Three kinds of motive
- European nations were driven by economic, political, and cultural motivations in their new imperial ventures in Asia and Africa.
- Three categories, and the CED gives no ranking — an answer naming only economics has taken a third of the claim.
- New matters too: this is intensification, not a first arrival, as 7.1 already said.
CED가 명명한 동기(motive)의 모든 세 가지 범위를 택하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
CED는 이들 사이에 서열을 제시하지 않습니다.
Weaponry made conquest cheap
- The development of advanced weaponry ensured the military advantage of Europeans over colonised areas.
- Ensured is strong — the CED is saying the outcome of the encounter was decided by the equipment.
- Unit 6's industry is what produced that equipment, so imperialism is an industrial consequence.
CED는 고도화된 무기가 ____ 군사적 우위를 ____了.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
강력한 표현: 결과는 장비에 의해 결정되었습니다.
Communication and transport made empire administrable
- Communication and transportation technologies facilitated the creation and expansion of European empires.
- Conquest is one problem; holding a territory a month's travel away is a different one.
- Telegraph and steamship shrink that month, which is what turns a conquest into an empire.
각 기술을 그것이 해결한 문제와 매칭하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
기술적 답변의 세 가지 명확한 부분.
A motive and an enabler answer different questions. The CED asks separately for the motivations that led to European imperialism and how technological advances enabled it — a motive explains why the attempt was made; an enabler explains why it succeeded.
동기, 아니면 어떤 enabling 요인?
새로운 제국주의의 각 요소를 분류하십시오.
'새로운 제국적 진전'은 첫 도착이 아닌 강화를 의미합니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
7.1의 스레드에서도 이미 언급된 바 있습니다.
Medicine made presence possible
- Advances in medicine enabled European survival in Africa and Asia.
- Enabled survival is a blunt statement: before this, disease limited how long Europeans could stay.
- So a technological answer has three distinct parts — winning, governing, and staying alive.
이 하위 주제의 가장 흔한 오류는...
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
동기는 왜를 설명하고, enableer는 왜 성공했는지를 설명합니다.
Motivations and enablers are different questions
- 7.6 carries two objectives: the motivations that led to imperialism, and how technological advances enabled it.
- A motive explains why someone tries; an enabler explains why the attempt succeeded.
- Answering the enabler question with motives, or the reverse, is the commonest error here.
Wanting a territory explains an expedition being sent. It does not explain the expedition arriving, holding what it took, or its members living long enough to govern it. Three different technologies answer those three questions, and none of them is a motive.
European nations were driven by economic, political, and cultural motivations in their new imperial ventures in Asia and Africa — three categories, unranked. Technology enabled them: advanced weaponry ensured the military advantage, communication and transportation technologies facilitated the creation and expansion of empires, and advances in medicine enabled European survival in Africa and Asia.