A conflict about roles, not persons
- The English Civil War — a conflict among the monarchy, Parliament and other elites over their respective roles in the political structure — exemplified the competition for power among monarchs and competing groups.
- The CED defines it by its subject: whose role is what in the structure.
- So it is a constitutional dispute fought as a war, which is why its outcome is a constitutional settlement.
Select all three parties the CED names.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
A two-sided account cannot explain the settlement's shape.
Three parties, not two
- The CED names the monarchy, Parliament and other elites — three, not two.
- That matters because the war's alignments shifted as the third group's interests changed.
- A two-sided account of the conflict cannot explain why the settlement took the shape it did.
The CED says the outcome protected the rights of...
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
Constitutionalism here is a defence of elite privilege against absolutism.
What the outcome protected
- The outcome of the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution protected the rights of gentry and aristocracy from absolutism through assertions of the rights of Parliament.
- The CED is precise about whose rights were protected: gentry and aristocracy.
- So this is constitutionalism as a defence of elite privilege against a centralising crown, not a democratic outcome.
Follow England from civil war to settlement
The Glorious Revolution protected the rights of the gentry and aristocracy from absolutism — which is what makes it the contrast case.
The CED defines the war by its subject: whose ____ is what in the political structure.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
It is a constitutional dispute fought as a war.
The CED names whose rights the outcome protected: gentry and aristocracy. Parliamentary rights were asserted as a defence of elite privilege against absolutism — reading the settlement as a democratic outcome states something the sentence does not.
3.7 will say absolute monarchies limited nobles' participation but preserved their social position.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
Here the aristocracy kept participation as well — same class, two settlements.
The mirror image of 3.7
- 3.7 will say absolute monarchies limited the nobility's participation in governance but preserved the aristocracy's social position.
- Here the aristocracy kept its participation as well as its position, by asserting the rights of Parliament.
- Same class, two settlements — and that is the sharpest comparison the unit offers.
Select all the causes available for this answer.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
Industrialisation is a nineteenth-century development.
Causes and consequences
- The objective is the causes and consequences of the English Civil War.
- Causes: disputed roles in the political structure, religious settlement from unit 2, and the fiscal demands of 3.6.
- Consequences: parliamentary rights asserted, elite privileges protected, and a constitutional model available for 3.8's comparison.
A crown seeks taxation without consent; a body that has always granted it refuses; the dispute is over which of them the constitution says may decide. Nobody in the room is arguing for a wider franchise. The war settles a boundary between institutions, and that is what the CED means by respective roles.
The English Civil War — a conflict among the monarchy, Parliament and other elites over their respective roles in the political structure — exemplified the competition for power among monarchs and competing groups. Its outcome and the Glorious Revolution protected the rights of gentry and aristocracy from absolutism through assertions of the rights of Parliament. Three parties, and an elite settlement.