| English | 의미 |
|---|---|
| Irony/ˈaɪrəni/ | 반어법 |
"The style is formal" is not an analysis
- Style is not one property a text either has or lacks.
- It is a mix, and naming the mix is what analysis means.
- Saying a style is formal names the result while skipping every component.
“Formal” names the outfit; style analysis asks about the fabric, the cut and why the writer wore it.
What style is made of
- A writer's style is the mix of word choice, syntax and conventions that writer employs.
- Three components, each analysable on its own.
- An analysis that names all three has explained the style; one that names the result has labelled it.
구성 요소, 결과, 또는 공백?
각 진술을 그것이 식별하는 것 기준으로 분류하십시오.
CED가 명명한 스타일의 구성 요소를 모두 선택하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
스타일은 전 세 가지의 혼합이며, 길이는 구성 요소가 아닙니다.
Irony as a signal
- Writers may signal a complex or ironic perspective through stylistic choices.
- Irony 反讽 emerges from the difference between what is said and what is meant, or between what is expected and what occurs.
- So irony is always a gap, and analysis means naming both sides of it.
아이러니는 ...에서 발생함
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
기대와 실제 사이 — 어떤 경우든 그것은 공백입니다.
Irony is a gap, so an analysis must name both sides of it. Saying "the writer is being ironic" identifies that a gap exists without saying what is on either side — which is the whole of the analysis.
구조적 아이러니를 찾기 위해, 주변 환경과 ____하는 수리적 내용中寻找 하십시오.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
손상된 증거 옆에 있는 과도한 찬사는 고전적인 신호입니다.
Finding irony without intuition
- Irony cannot be looked up, which makes it hard for a second-language reader.
- Use a structural method: find a sentence whose literal content clashes with its surroundings.
- Excessive praise beside damaging evidence, or a calm register beside an outrageous fact, is the signal.
"작가가 아이러니를 쓰고 있다"고 말하는 것은 완전한 분석이 아닙니다.
난이도 1/5 · 100 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
아이러니는 공백이며, 분석은 반드시 양쪽 모두를 명시해야 합니다.
아이러니 분석의 각 단계를 그것이 제공하는内容与 매칭하십시오.
난이도 2/5 · 140 코인 + 오늘 첫 완료 시 소액 보너스
두 면과 효과 — 주장, 증거, 비평과 동일한 삼부형 형태입니다.
Writing about irony
- Say what the words claim. Say what the writer means. Then say what the gap does to the reader.
- The reader who sees the gap is being invited into an understanding the text never states.
- That invitation is often the point — irony makes an ally of a reader who catches it.
"The results, such as they were, arrived exactly on schedule." Said: a compliment about punctuality. Meant: the results were not worth having, so punctuality is the only praise left — and it is worth nothing.
Style is the mix of word choice, syntax and conventions — name the components, not the result. Irony is a gap between what is said and what is meant, or between expectation and outcome. Find it structurally: literal content clashing with its surroundings. Then name both sides.