Gas identification: carbon dioxide clouds limewater
導入済み| English | 意味 |
|---|---|
| limewater/ˈlaɪmwɔːtə/ | 石灰水 |
| cloudy result/ˈklaʊdi rɪˈzʌlt/ | 濁る結果 |
What would explain this observation?
- A carbonate reacting with acid releases gas. Bubbling a small sample through limewater 石灰水 gives a cloudy appearance, adding identification evidence to the reaction prediction.
- Start with a prediction. State the quantities or features you would compare, then decide what evidence could distinguish two explanations.
Build the model
- Limewater is an aqueous solution of calcium hydroxide. Carbon dioxide shaken with limewater or bubbled through it turns the solution milky or cloudy. The white insoluble calcium carbonate produced makes it cloudy: CO₂ + Ca(OH)₂ → CaCO₃ + H₂O. A precipitate is a newly formed insoluble solid dispersed in the liquid, not simply an unreacted starting powder or a colourless gas bubble.
- limewater: An aqueous calcium hydroxide solution used in the carbon-dioxide test; cloudy result 浑浊结果: Loss of solution clarity through the stated suspended solid in a positive limewater test.
Which reagent and result support carbon dioxide?
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
Carbon dioxide reacts with limewater to form a fine calcium carbonate suspension, turning it milky. A relit glowing splint is the oxygen test, and dry litmus responds to neither.
Match each technical term to its precise meaning.
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
Use the definitions to distinguish related quantities and processes.
Choose evidence that can test it
- State the reagent and the positive result together. A flame going out is not a unique carbon-dioxide test because several gases fail to support combustion. Under continued excess carbon dioxide the cloudiness can eventually disappear by further reaction; that optional observation does not invalidate the initial specified milky result. Do not substitute that extension for the basic test or make students memorise an unrequired second equation.
- Use teacher-approved dilute reagents and an open gas-delivery path that prevents pressure buildup. For a carbonate demonstration, add the selected dilute acid only under the school method, then direct a small gas sample into fresh limewater. Avoid suck-back and unapproved gas generation. Record the initial clarity, reagent identity and actual change, comparing a suitable blank when provided. Distinguish the measured observation from an inferred gas identity.
Which two habits make the investigation or model in this case more defensible?
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
Stating the conditions and assumptions lets others repeat the work exactly, and recording the supporting evidence lets them check the conclusion. Hiding disagreeing results removes the evidence that could challenge a wrong conclusion, and one measurement can never establish a wider claim.
Work from known quantities
- State the known values and their units. Choose the relation because its assumptions fit this case, then rearrange before substitution.
- Known: an original observation table contains 12 samples tested with the same fresh limewater method; nine become cloudy and three remain clear. Cloudy-result fraction=9/12=0.75, or 75%. This does not measure CO₂ percentage in any individual sample. A clear result may be inconclusive if gas transfer failed; a carefully documented method matters more than counting positives alone.
Eight of ten supplied observations show cloudy limewater. Calculate the cloudy-result percentage. Use the same sequence: known quantities → model → relation → substitution → unit and interpretation.
Eight of ten supplied observations show cloudy limewater. Calculate the cloudy-result percentage.
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
The result is 80 %. Known: 8 of 10 observations cloudy. Use percentage = cloudy / total x 100. Percentage = 8/10 x 100 = 80%. A clear result can be inconclusive if the gas transfer failed.
Check the conclusion and its limits
- Limewater is not just any calcium-containing liquid, and cloudiness is not a green flame. Do not report a carbonate ion as a gas: the carbonate reaction produces carbon dioxide, whose test provides the observation. The source equation conserves Ca, C, O and H, but a balanced equation does not replace the actual school evidence record.
- Return to the original observation. Explain what the result supports, which conditions it assumes, and one way to test a competing explanation.
A flame going out uniquely identifies carbon dioxide. This claim is false: Any gas that does not support combustion - nitrogen, for example - extinguishes a flame. Only the milky limewater result identifies carbon dioxide specifically.
Gas identification: carbon dioxide clouds limewater: State the reagent and the positive result together. A flame going out is not a unique carbon-dioxide test because several gases fail to support combustion. Under continued excess carbon dioxide the cloudiness can eventually disappear by further reaction; that optional observation does not invalidate the initial specified milky result. Do not substitute that extension for the basic test or make students memorise an unrequired second equation.
A flame going out uniquely identifies carbon dioxide.
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
Any gas that does not support combustion - nitrogen, for example - extinguishes a flame. Only the milky limewater result identifies carbon dioxide specifically.
An aqueous calcium hydroxide solution used in the carbon-dioxide test: write the technical term.
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
limewater means An aqueous calcium hydroxide solution used in the carbon-dioxide test.