Three kinds of motive
- European nations were driven by economic, political, and cultural motivations in their new imperial ventures in Asia and Africa.
- Three categories, and the CED gives no ranking — an answer naming only economics has taken a third of the claim.
- New matters too: this is intensification, not a first arrival, as 7.1 already said.
CEDが挙げた動機のすべての三つのカテゴリーを選択せよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
CEDはこれらに順位をつけていない。
Weaponry made conquest cheap
- The development of advanced weaponry ensured the military advantage of Europeans over colonised areas.
- Ensured is strong — the CED is saying the outcome of the encounter was decided by the equipment.
- Unit 6's industry is what produced that equipment, so imperialism is an industrial consequence.
CEDは、「先進的な兵器____軍事上の優位をもたらした」と述べている。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
強い表現：結果は装備品によって決まった。
Communication and transport made empire administrable
- Communication and transportation technologies facilitated the creation and expansion of European empires.
- Conquest is one problem; holding a territory a month's travel away is a different one.
- Telegraph and steamship shrink that month, which is what turns a conquest into an empire.
各技術が解決した問題に対応させよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
技術的解答の三つの明確な部分。
A motive and an enabler answer different questions. The CED asks separately for the motivations that led to European imperialism and how technological advances enabled it — a motive explains why the attempt was made; an enabler explains why it succeeded.
動機か、それとも促進要因か？
新帝国主義の各要素を分類せよ。
'新しい植民地進出'は初来 Rather than 強化を示す。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
7.1のスレッドで既に述べた通り。
Medicine made presence possible
- Advances in medicine enabled European survival in Africa and Asia.
- Enabled survival is a blunt statement: before this, disease limited how long Europeans could stay.
- So a technological answer has three distinct parts — winning, governing, and staying alive.
このサブトピックにおける最も一般的な誤りは...
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
動機は「なぜ行われたか」を説明し、促進要因は「なぜ成功したか」を説明する。
Motivations and enablers are different questions
- 7.6 carries two objectives: the motivations that led to imperialism, and how technological advances enabled it.
- A motive explains why someone tries; an enabler explains why the attempt succeeded.
- Answering the enabler question with motives, or the reverse, is the commonest error here.
Wanting a territory explains an expedition being sent. It does not explain the expedition arriving, holding what it took, or its members living long enough to govern it. Three different technologies answer those three questions, and none of them is a motive.
European nations were driven by economic, political, and cultural motivations in their new imperial ventures in Asia and Africa — three categories, unranked. Technology enabled them: advanced weaponry ensured the military advantage, communication and transportation technologies facilitated the creation and expansion of empires, and advances in medicine enabled European survival in Africa and Asia.