Nuclear changes and radiation evidence
| English | Français |
|---|---|
| half-life/hɑːf laɪf/ | demi-vie |
| background radiation/ˈbækɡraʊnd ˌreɪdɪˈeɪʃn/ | rayonnement de fond |
What would explain this observation?
- A detector records counts even when the classroom source is removed. Background must be considered before attributing every count to the source.
- Start with a prediction. State the quantities or features you would compare, then decide what evidence could distinguish two explanations.
Build the model
- Radioactive decay is spontaneous and random for an individual nucleus. Half-life · Demi-vie 半衰期 describes the time for half the undecayed nuclei in a large population to decay, or for background-corrected activity to halve.
- half-life: Time for activity or undecayed population to halve; background radiation 本底辐射: Radiation measured apart from the investigated source.
Which count should be used for source activity?
Subtract background counts measured over the same time interval. Distinguish irradiation from contamination. Shielding, distance and reduced exposure time can reduce risk under a school-controlled procedure.
Match each technical term to its precise meaning.
Use the definitions to distinguish related quantities and processes.
Choose evidence that can test it
- Subtract background counts measured over the same time interval. Distinguish irradiation from contamination. Shielding, distance and reduced exposure time can reduce risk under a school-controlled procedure.
- Use teacher-managed sources and the school radiation rules. Record count duration and repeat background measurements. Do not extrapolate a half-life from one nucleus or from uncorrected readings.
Which two habits make the investigation or model in this case more defensible?
Use teacher-managed sources and the school radiation rules. Record count duration and repeat background measurements. Do not extrapolate a half-life from one nucleus or from uncorrected readings.
Work from known quantities
- State the known values and their units. Choose the relation because its assumptions fit this case, then rearrange before substitution.
- Known: measured count rate falls from 100 to 55 counts per minute; background is 10. Source rates are 90 and 45, so one half-life has elapsed. Without subtraction, 55/100 would obscure the exact half in this example.
An initial source count is 160 per minute. Find it after three half-lives. Use the same sequence: known quantities → model → relation → substitution → unit and interpretation.
An initial source count is 160 per minute. Find it after three half-lives.
The result is 20 counts/min. Known: measured count rate falls from 100 to 55 counts per minute; background is 10. Source rates are 90 and 45, so one half-life has elapsed. Without subtraction, 55/100 would obscure the exact half in this example.
Check the conclusion and its limits
- An irradiated object is not automatically radioactive. A half-life does not predict the exact decay time of one nucleus.
- Return to the original observation. Explain what the result supports, which conditions it assumes, and one way to test a competing explanation.
Half-life predicts the exact decay time of an individual nucleus. This claim is false: An irradiated object is not automatically radioactive. A half-life does not predict the exact decay time of one nucleus.
Nuclear changes and radiation evidence: Subtract background counts measured over the same time interval. Distinguish irradiation from contamination. Shielding, distance and reduced exposure time can reduce risk under a school-controlled procedure.
Half-life predicts the exact decay time of an individual nucleus.
An irradiated object is not automatically radioactive. A half-life does not predict the exact decay time of one nucleus.
Time for activity or undecayed population to halve: write the technical term.
half-life means Time for activity or undecayed population to halve.