Sources, meaning and religious practice · 来源、意义与宗教实践
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| interpretation/ɪnˌtɜːprɪˈteɪʃn/ | 诠释 | quán shì |
| doctrine/ˈdɒktrɪn/ | 教义 | jiào yì |
A decision you can investigate
- A sacred narrative and an adherent's account may illuminate different aspects of the same practice.
- The relationship needs interpretation 诠释, not a claim that text determines every action.
一个你可以调查的决策
- 神圣叙事与信徒的个人叙述可能揭示同一实践的不同侧面。
- 二者之间的关系需要interpretation 诠释，而非断言文本决定了每一个具体行动。
Build the explanation
- In-depth study examines a tradition's beliefs, practices and responses to central questions.
- Identify the source's status, interpretation and community context before connecting it to lived experience.
构建解释
- 深入研究旨在考察某一传统的信仰体系、实践方式及其对核心问题的回应。
- 在将其与实际生活体验相联系之前，应先确认资料来源的性质、解读方式及所属社群的背景。
Match the terms to their precise meanings. · 将术语与其精确含义匹配。
Use these definitions in the particular context of Sources, meaning and religious practice. · 在来源、意义及宗教实践的特定语境中使用这些定义。
Work through the evidence
- Compare a reliable account of a practice with a relevant text and an academic interpretation. Explain where they agree and where local context changes emphasis.
- Use precise terms from the selected religion and acknowledge interpretive differences.
梳理证据
- 将关于某项实践的可靠叙述、相关文献以及学术解读进行比较。说明它们在哪些方面一致，以及在哪些地方受当地环境影响而改变了侧重点。
- 使用所选宗教中的精确术语，并承认存在不同的解读视角。
What strengthens an account of a religious practice? · 什么因素能增强对某种宗教实践的描述？
Compare a reliable account of a practice with a relevant text and an academic interpretation. Explain where they agree and where local context changes emphasis. Use precise terms from the selected religion and acknowledge interpretive differences. · 将关于某项实践的可靠记述与相关文本及学术解释进行比较。说明它们一致之处以及地方语境如何改变侧重点。使用所选宗教的精确术语，并承认解释上的差异。
Test the limits
- School chooses two in-depth religions under the group rule.
- A comparative table of names is not adequate preparation for the extended responses in Paper 2.
测试极限
- 学校根据分组规则选定两种进行深入研究的宗教。
- 仅有一张名称对照表不足以应对Paper 2中的扩展问答题目。
Which caution belongs to this particular task? · 哪项注意事项适用于此特定任务？
School chooses two in-depth religions under the group rule. A comparative table of names is not adequate preparation for the extended responses in Paper 2. · 学校根据团体规则选择两门深入研究的宗教。仅凭名称对照表不足以应对Paper 2中的扩展问答。
The explanation in this lesson makes a conditional claim; relevant context and evidence still matter. · 本课的解释提出了条件性主张；相关背景和证据仍然重要。
A comparative table of names is not adequate preparation for the extended responses in Paper 2. · 仅有一张名称对照表不足以应对Paper 2中的扩展问答部分。
Apply and explain your answer
- What strengthens an account of a religious practice?
- A connection between reliable sources, meanings and lived context, including differences of interpretation.
应用并解释你的答案
- 什么因素能够增强一份关于宗教实践叙述的可信度？
- 可靠来源、意义与生活语境之间的关联，包括解释上的差异。
Choose the two statements supported by this lesson. · 选择本课支持的两项陈述。
The concept and worked evidence support these claims; the stated limits rule out the universal shortcut. · 概念和推演证据支持这些主张；明确的限制排除了普遍捷径。
Use the terms precisely
- doctrine 教义: Teachings or principles within a religious tradition.
- interpretation: A reasoned account of meaning in a source or practice.
精确使用术语
- doctrine 教义：宗教传统内的教导或原则。
- interpretation: 对来源或实践意义的理性阐述。
Compare a reliable account of a practice with a relevant text and an academic interpretation. Explain where they agree and where local context changes emphasis. Use precise terms from the selected religion and acknowledge interpretive differences.
School chooses two in-depth religions under the group rule. A comparative table of names is not adequate preparation for the extended responses in Paper 2.
In-depth study examines a tradition's beliefs, practices and responses to central questions.
将关于某项实践的可靠记述与相关文本及学术解释进行比较。说明它们一致之处以及地方语境如何改变侧重点。使用所选宗教的精确术语，并承认解释上的差异。
学校根据团体规则选择两门深入研究的宗教。仅凭名称对照表不足以应对Paper 2中的扩展问答。
深入研究考察一种传统的信仰、实践及对核心问题的回应。