Ethical design, data and evaluation · 伦理设计、数据与评估
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| independent variable/ˌɪndɪˈpendənt ˈveərɪəbl/ | 自变量 | zì biàn liàng |
| dependent variable/dɪˈpendənt ˈveərɪəbl/ | 因变量 | yīn biàn liàng |
A decision you can investigate
- You want to test whether a harmless change in word presentation affects recall.
- The procedure needs ethical approval before collecting data.
Build the explanation
- The independent variable 自变量 is deliberately changed; the dependent variable 因变量 is measured.
- Controls, standardized instructions, consent and withdrawal protect both participants and interpretation.
Match the terms to their precise meanings. · 将术语与其精确含义匹配。
Use these definitions in the particular context of Ethical design, data and evaluation. · 在伦理设计、数据与评估的特定语境中使用这些定义。
Work through the evidence
- Compare two approved presentation formats using a justified allocation method. Record recall consistently and retain anonymized raw data.
- Describe the design before selecting suitable descriptive and inferential analysis with the teacher.
Which variable is the dependent variable in this task? · 此任务中的因变量是什么？
Compare two approved presentation formats using a justified allocation method. Record recall consistently and retain anonymized raw data. Describe the design before selecting suitable descriptive and inferential analysis with the teacher. · 使用有依据的分配方法比较两种经批准的呈现格式。一致记录记忆提取结果，并保留匿名化原始数据。在与教师商定选择合适的描述性和推断性分析之前，先描述研究设计。
Test the limits
- Avoid deception, sensitive topics and unsupported statistical claims. The current IA is a real supervised experimental study.
- For first assessment 2027 the IA becomes a research proposal: do not relabel this experiment as the new requirement.
Which caution belongs to this particular task? · 哪项注意事项适用于此特定任务？
Avoid deception, sensitive topics and unsupported statistical claims. The current IA is a real supervised experimental study. For first assessment 2027 the IA becomes a research proposal: do not relabel this experiment as the new requirement. · 避免欺骗、敏感话题和无根据的统计主张。当前的内部评估（IA）是一项真实且受监督的实验研究。对于首次评估2027，IA变为研究提案：不要将此实验重新标记为新要求。
The explanation in this lesson makes a conditional claim; relevant context and evidence still matter. · 本课的解释提出了条件性主张；相关背景和证据仍然重要。
For first assessment 2027 the IA becomes a research proposal: do not relabel this experiment as the new requirement. · 对于首次评估 2027，内部评估将成为一份研究提案：不要将此实验重新标记为新要求。
Apply and explain your answer
- Which variable is the dependent variable in this task?
- The measured recall score.
Choose the two statements supported by this lesson. · 选择本课支持的两项陈述。
The concept and worked evidence support these claims; the stated limits rule out the universal shortcut. · 概念和推演证据支持这些主张；明确的限制排除了普遍捷径。
Use the terms precisely
- independent variable: The factor deliberately changed in an experiment.
- dependent variable: The outcome measured in a study.
Compare two approved presentation formats using a justified allocation method. Record recall consistently and retain anonymized raw data. Describe the design before selecting suitable descriptive and inferential analysis with the teacher.
Avoid deception, sensitive topics and unsupported statistical claims. The current IA is a real supervised experimental study. For first assessment 2027 the IA becomes a research proposal: do not relabel this experiment as the new requirement.
The independent variable is deliberately changed; the dependent variable is measured.