Your learning plan · Continue · Review →
Relative clauses — defining and non-defining
Đã giới thiệuVị trí đã lưu của bạn vẫn giữ nguyên trong trình duyệt này. Tiếp tục sẽ không hoàn thành bài học hay trả lời câu hỏi của nó.
Identifying and supplementary information

- A defining relative clause helps specify the person, thing or group meant. A non-defining clause presents a separate supplementary comment about an identified referent.
- The distinction concerns the intended message, not whether the added fact is important in real life. Commas signal the supplementary reading in writing.
- Outcome: choose a clause and punctuation that preserve the intended group and information. Start with relative-clause roles. Starting check: does students who registered necessarily mean all students? The clause selects the registered group.
The cat, which ignores instructions, ate the note that explained the rules.
Defining — which person, thing or group?
- The man who called you is my boss identifies the man through the call. A defining clause has no separating commas.
- Compare The volunteers who arrived early opened the room: it selects the early arrivals. It does not say that all volunteers arrived early.
- Removing a defining clause can still leave a grammatical sentence, but change its reference or scope. The deletion test alone cannot decide the intended meaning.
Non-defining — a supplementary comment
- The volunteers, who arrived early, opened the room presents early arrival as a supplementary fact about the already identified volunteers as a group.
- A clause inside the sentence is set off on both sides: My boss, who is very kind, called me. At the end, one introductory comma is enough: I called my boss, who was very kind.
- A unique name or a family relationship does not mechanically choose punctuation. Use the context and intended information; do not infer someone’s family structure from a comma exercise.
Do the commas matter here?
Read whether the written relative clause selects a referent/subset or adds supplementary information. Punctuation marks that intended relation; deletion alone is not a reliable test.
In standard writing, how is a supplementary (non-defining) relative clause separated from the main clause?
Độ khó 1/5 · 100 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
It is set off with commas: one before a final supplementary clause, or a pair when the clause is inside the sentence. This signals its information status, not that the fact is unimportant.
Translate into one English sentence using a non-defining who-clause to add the description: 我老板人很好,他给我打了电话。
Độ khó 3/5 · 200 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
One solution is “My boss, who is very kind, called me.” The task requests that supplementary construction; it is not the only natural way to translate the Chinese.
More than who and which
- Standard non-defining clauses can use who, whom, whose or which, as appropriate: Nora, whose bike was stolen, took the bus. They do not use relative that, and their relative word is not omitted.
- Supplementary location and time clauses also occur: We returned to the hall, where the meeting had begun. Choose the form for the relation you mean.
- In a defining clause, an object relative may be omitted; a subject relative may not: the book I bought but the book that fell. “Defining” does not mean that every relative word is optional.
Complete the non-defining clause: My phone, ___ is new, broke. (for a thing)
Độ khó 1/5 · 100 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
Non-defining + a thing → which (never “that”): “My phone, which is new, …”.
Is this correct? “My boss, that is kind, called me.”
Độ khó 1/5 · 100 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
Non-defining clauses can't use “that”: use “who”: “My boss, who is kind, …”.
Repair the intended scope
- My mother who lives in Beijing is kind should not be marked wrong solely because the noun is mother. In ordinary contexts a supplementary description is likely: My mother, who lives in Beijing, is kind. Identify the intended reading rather than asserting a universal family rule.
- He failed, which surprised us can use which to refer to the whole preceding fact. He failed, it surprised us needs a sentence boundary or a coordinating construction in standard writing.
- Near miss: if only two of five parcels are damaged, The parcels, which are damaged, need replacing wrongly presents damage as a fact about the whole identified group. The parcels which are damaged need replacing selects the damaged subset.
Match each sentence to its clause type.
Độ khó 2/5 · 140 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
The first clause identifies which man; the second adds a description of the identified boss. In the third, which refers to the fact that he was late. A grammatical sentence after deletion does not by itself prove that an original clause was non-defining.
Is this correct? “My boss, that is kind, called me.”
Độ khó 1/5 · 100 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
Non-defining clauses never take that → My boss, who is kind, called me.
- Ask what the relative clause selects or adds, then punctuate that intended message.
- Do not use relative that or omit the relative word in standard non-defining clauses. Whose/whom/where/when are not excluded merely because the clause is supplementary.
- Later recall: invent a group and describe only a selected subset; then write a different sentence adding a fact about the whole group. Explain the change. Continue with contrast linkers to connect those facts without changing their scope.
Usage checked 2026-10-20: Cambridge, defining and non-defining clauses and relative pronouns.
Write one English sentence adding a supplementary description with who or which. Use a non-defining relative clause and appropriate comma punctuation.
Độ khó 3/5 · 200 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
Example: “Shanghai, which is a huge city, has great food.” A final supplementary clause is also possible: “We visited Shanghai, which has great food.” One introductory comma is sufficient when the clause ends the sentence.
Five bikes are in a rack; only two have broken lights. A mechanic writes, “The bikes which have broken lights need repair.” Which reading fits the defining clause as written?
Độ khó 1/5 · 100 xu + một phần thưởng nhỏ cho lần hoàn thành đầu tiên trong ngày
Without separating commas, which have broken lights selects the relevant subset. The source says only two have that fault; do not expand the claim to all five. Deleting the clause leaves a grammatical sentence but loses the selection. If you expanded the group, mark the qualifying words and state exactly which bikes they select.
A club has eight members. Three booked the early train; the other five will travel later. Write an English message selecting just the three early travellers for a 7:00 meeting. Then add a separate sentence giving a supplementary fact about the already identified organiser, Mina, using a non-defining relative clause. Invent that extra fact. Compare and revise one scope or punctuation issue.
Compare the intended meaning and the relevant clause/form choices. Revise one supported issue; this local self-review does not award correctness or proficiency.