Comparing Distributions of a Quantitative Variable
| English | Chinese | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| parallel boxplots | 平行箱线图 | píng xíng xiāng xiàn tú |
Putting two groups side by side
- Often the real question is a comparison: do boys and girls, or two treatments, differ?
- Show the groups together with parallel boxplots 平行箱线图 or back-to-back displays.
- Then compare them explicitly, feature by feature.
- A good comparison names the difference and its direction, in context.
One group's boxplot
Placing two boxplots side by side lets you compare their centers, spreads, and shapes explicitly.
Parallel boxplots are a good way to compare two or more distributions.
They align groups on the same scale.
Compare shape, center, spread
- Shape: is each group symmetric or skewed? Do they differ in form?
- Center: which group has the higher median (or mean)? By how much?
- Spread: which group is more variable (bigger IQR or SD)?
- Address all three — a comparison that mentions only the center is incomplete.
A complete comparison of two groups addresses which features?
Shape, center, spread, and unusual features for both groups.
A wider box (larger IQR) means a group is...
Bigger IQR = more spread = more variable.
Use comparative language
- Say it comparatively: "Group A's median is greater than Group B's," or "Group A is more variable than Group B."
- Vague statements ("they're different") earn no credit — be specific about what differs and which way.
- Always tie the comparison to the context (the actual variable and groups).
- Comparative words — greater, less, more spread out — are what graders look for.
Which statement earns credit on the AP exam?
Explicit, directional, in context.
Comparisons should be ____ — stating which group is greater and by how much.
Directional, quantified, in context.
Note outliers and unusual features
- Do the groups differ in outliers or other unusual features?
- One group might have a high outlier the other lacks, or a gap.
- Mention these differences too — they can be the most interesting finding.
- A complete comparison covers shape, center, spread, and unusual features for both groups.
If one group has a low outlier the other lacks, you should...
Differences in outliers are part of a complete comparison.
Comparisons must be explicit and directional: "Group A's median (72) is higher than Group B's (65)" — not just "the medians are different." State which group is greater/more variable, by roughly how much, in context. Merely describing each group separately, without comparing, misses the point.
Parallel boxplots of test scores for Class A and Class B.
- Center: Class A's median ($78$) is greater than Class B's ($70$).
- Spread: Class B is more variable (a wider box/IQR).
- Shape/unusual: both roughly symmetric, but Class B has a low outlier that Class A lacks.
Compare distributions with parallel boxplots (or back-to-back plots), addressing shape, center, spread, and unusual features for both groups. Use explicit comparative language ("greater than," "more variable than") with direction and context — not just "they differ."