Government macroeconomic policy objectives
| English | Chinese | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| price stability | 物价稳定 | wù jià wěn dìng |
| balance of payments | 国际收支 | guó jì shōu zhī |
| equity | 公平 | gōng píng |
| trade-offs | 权衡取舍 | quán héng qǔ shě |
Juggling four balls at once
- A finance minister can rarely fix everything at once: chase growth and inflation creeps up; tame inflation and jobs are lost.
- Real policy is about prioritising among competing objectives — and accepting that hitting one may mean missing another.
Macro objective lab
Classify policy examples by the macroeconomic objective they target.
Which set best lists the main macroeconomic objectives?
These four (plus equity and the environment) are the standard objectives.
The objectives, recapped
- Growth, low unemployment, price stability 物价稳定, and a sound balance of payments 国际收支 — plus equity 公平 and the environment.
- At any moment, a government weighs which matters most given the state of the economy.

Central banks, such as the European Central Bank, are a main tool of macroeconomic policy
In a deep recession, a government would most likely prioritise:
When output and jobs are falling, reviving growth and employment comes first.
Pursuing faster growth can conflict with controlling inflation.
A booming economy can overheat, pushing up prices — a classic conflict.
Match each objective pair to the conflict between them.
Improving one objective often worsens another.
Why they conflict
- Growth vs inflation/BoP: a boom can overheat prices and suck in imports.
- Inflation vs unemployment: cooling inflation with high rates can raise joblessness.
- Growth vs environment: faster output can mean more pollution.

The main macroeconomic objectives often pull against each other, so hitting one can mean missing another
Priorities shift with the cycle. In a recession, governments prioritise growth and jobs; when inflation is high, they switch to price stability — the same objectives, reordered.

The Laffer curve
Because objectives conflict, policy always involves making ______.
No policy improves every objective at once.
Making the trade-offs 权衡取舍
- Good policy states the objective, picks the tool best suited to it, and accepts the cost to other objectives.
- There is no policy that improves everything at once — economics is the study of these trade-offs.

Government borrowing raises interest rates and crowds out private investment
You've got it
- objectives: growth, low unemployment, price stability, balance of payments (+ equity, environment)
- they conflict (growth vs inflation; inflation vs unemployment; growth vs environment)
- policy means prioritising and accepting trade-offs, reordered as the economy changes