Classification of goods and services
| English | Chinese | Pinyin |
|---|---|---|
| economic good | 经济物品 | jīng jì wù pǐn |
| free good | 免费物品 | miǎn fèi wù pǐn |
| public good | 公共物品 | gōng gòng wù pǐn |
| private good | 私人物品 | sī rén wù pǐn |
| rival | 竞争性的 | jìng zhēng xìng de |
| excludable | 排他性的 | pái tā xìng de |
| free-rider | 搭便车 | dā biàn chē |
| demerit good | 劣值品 | liè zhí pǐn |
| merit good | 优值品 | yōu zhí pǐn |
Why no one sells fresh air
- Air is essential — yet free, because it isn't scarce. The moment something is scarce, it gets a price and becomes an economic good 经济物品.
- Not all goods behave the same way in a market; sorting them explains where markets work and where they fail.
Goods and services lab
Classify examples by rivalry, excludability or whether they are services.
Free vs economic goods
- A free good 免费物品 has no opportunity cost — unlimited relative to wants (e.g. air, sunlight).
- An economic good is scarce, so producing it has an opportunity cost and it commands a price.
The four types of good, classified by rivalry and excludability
A free good is one that:
A free good (like air) is unlimited relative to wants, so using it costs nothing.
Private vs public goods 公共物品
- Rival: one person's use reduces another's. Excludable: you can stop non-payers. Public goods are neither — so markets under-provide them (the free-rider 搭便车 problem).
Making more capital goods today shifts the future PPC out further
A public good is:
Public goods (e.g. street lighting) are non-rival and non-excludable — hence the free-rider problem.
Because non-payers cannot be excluded from a public good, markets suffer the ______-rider problem.
People can enjoy a public good without paying — the free-rider problem — so markets under-provide it.
Merit and demerit goods 劣值品
- A merit good 优值品 is better for you than you realise, so it's under-consumed (education, vaccines) — governments encourage it.
- A demerit good is worse than you realise, so it's over-consumed (tobacco, alcohol) — governments discourage it.
Public ≠ merit. A public good is defined by non-rivalry/non-excludability; a merit good is about mis-judged benefit. Education is a merit good but is excludable (so not a pure public good).
Match each good to its type.
Street lighting is non-rival/non-excludable; an apple is rival/excludable; vaccines are under-consumed merit goods; tobacco is an over-consumed demerit good.
A merit good is under-consumed because people undervalue its benefits.
Merit goods (education, vaccines) are under-consumed, so governments encourage them.
You've got it
- free good (no opportunity cost) vs economic good (scarce, has a price)
- public good = non-rival and non-excludable → markets under-provide (free-rider problem)
- merit goods under-consumed (encourage); demerit goods over-consumed (discourage)