IB Diploma Programme Theatre SL (first assessment 2024; current guide). The research presentation is shared by SL and HL (35% at SL): plan, deliver and video-record an individual presentation of 15 minutes maximum on an UNFAMILIAR world theatre tradition, providing evidence of academic and practical research with a list of all sources cited. This handout teaches the research-and-presentation craft and kits the traditions most commonly chosen. All worked framings are original.
Must-know for the research presentation:
Family
Content
task
15-minute video; academic + practical evidence; sources list
tradition
performance convention in context: ritual, social function, aesthetics
method
embodied research: learn the convention, not about it
ethics
attribution, ownership, avoiding appropriation and stereotype
A world theatre tradition 世界戏剧传统 is a living performance system: its convention 惯例 (the distinctive performance practice: a masked form, a chant, a movement code, a staging custom), its CONTEXT (where, when, for whom, inside what ritual or celebration or entertainment), its social function 社会功能 (what the performance DOES in its community — worship, protest, mourning, feast), and its AESTHETICS (the rules of beauty and effectiveness the tradition itself holds). The research runs on two legs, and the marks require BOTH: ACADEMIC (scholarship, primary accounts, interviews, recordings — properly cited) and PRACTICAL (the student learns the convention in workshops: attempting the mask, the drum pattern, the movement — and documents the attempts). Knowledge resides in the body: a presentation that only describes is half the task.
Research ethics 研究伦理: attribute living practitioners and sources; treat the tradition as its community's property (what may be learned, what performed, what is closed); avoid the stereotype compile and the exotic montage — the tradition is a system, not a curiosity. The presentation says what the researcher could NOT learn and why: the honesty the top band rewards.
Worked example. A student researching a masked dance-drama tradition: academic leg (the scholarship on the mask's meaning, an interview with a teacher-practitioner, festival recordings); embodied leg (workshop attempts at the posture and the walk, filmed — the first attempts failing is DATA: what the body must unlearn to wear the convention); presentation analysis (why the mask works only with the chant — the convention is a SYSTEM, and isolating one element breaks it, which the embodied failure demonstrates).
The 15-minute presentation 演示 is structured, not streamed: HOOK (30 seconds of the convention itself — the mask enters before the explanation); CONTEXT (the tradition's world: place, occasion, community, in two minutes); DEMONSTRATION (the embodied research shown: the workshop attempts, the learning curve); ANALYSIS (the convention unpacked as a system — what each element does, how the elements interlock, what the tradition's own aesthetics value); REFLECTION (what the research taught about theatre itself — the transferable insight, and the limits owned: what could not be learned from outside the community). The video is continuous and unedited: rehearse to the clock, and let the demonstration carry the analysis — show, then say what the showing showed.
Four commonly chosen families, each with its anchor convention and its intercultural lesson. COMMUNAL RITUAL FORMS: performance embedded in ceremony — the convention is the community's act, not a repertoire; the lesson: “theatre” and “ritual” are our boxes, not theirs. MASKED DANCE-DRAMA TRADITIONS (Asia): the mask as a spiritual technology — the performer becomes, not represents; the movement code trains years; the lesson: convention as accumulated body-knowledge. DANCE-THEATRE AND MOVEMENT CODES: codified gesture vocabularies where the hand's angle carries meaning; the lesson: movement as a language with grammar, learnable only in the body. STREET AND PROTEST FORMS: performance as public claim — the audience is the street, the state is the context; the lesson: theatre's function is political wherever it is made. The choice rule: a tradition the student can research BOTH ways — where practitioner contact or workshop access genuinely exists.
2.5
Checklist
The task's facts: 15-minute continuous video, academic AND practical evidence, sources list (task).
The tradition researched as a system: convention, context, social function, aesthetics (tradition).
The embodied leg: workshop attempts documented, failure as data (method).
The presentation's five moves: hook, context, demonstration, analysis, reflection — show, then say (presentation).
The four kits' anchor conventions and intercultural lessons (kits).
Boundary notes: the presentation is marked on research breadth and depth, practical exploration, presentation skill and reflection - the demonstration must carry the analysis. All worked framings are original.
Supported preparation: Research and embodied convention
Scope and prerequisites
IB theatre first assessment 2024. Teacher approves previously unstudied play texts, traditions and theorists where required. Actual rehearsals, performances and recorded presentations remain school-supervised tasks.
Mapped preparation outcomes: ib_theatre_sl.2.1, ib_theatre_sl.2.2. Read the matching native lesson first. Actual approved choices, evidence and final learner work remain separate.
Source vocabulary
performance convention 表演惯例; embodied research 具身研究.
Explanation and worked method
A tradition inquiry needs reliable credited sources about context, function and a specific convention. Explore the convention safely and reflect on what practical experience reveals beyond reading; respect restrictions and avoid claiming to represent a whole culture.
Task: a pupil copies a movement from an unattributed clip and calls it a tradition. Improve the plan.
Establish the source and eligible previously unstudied tradition, verify meaning and restrictions with reliable material, then select one bounded convention for approved practice. Record first and revised trials and explain the researched reason for change.
Independent transfer
A practitioner source contradicts an online caption. How should research and exploration respond?
Attempt independently before reading the model.
Checked original model
Check authorship, context, purpose and the precise convention, compare reliable evidence and retain the uncertainty. Revise approved practice if warranted and credit the source. Neither a convenient caption nor practitioner status alone settles every contextual claim.
These are authored formative expectations, not official IB descriptors. Accept other justified arguments with evidence and material limits.
Source and task holds
This supplement teaches the method for this part of the course. The full assessment criteria and any texts your school chooses come from your teacher.
Interactive lessons on this topic
Work through it step by step, with instant-check exercises.