証拠を用いて自身の貢献と学習を示す
導入済み| English | 意味 |
|---|---|
| contribution/ˌkɒntrɪˈbjuːʃn/ | 寄与 |
| decision record/dɪˈsɪʒn ˈrekɔːd/ | 意思決定の記録 |
| corroboration/kəˌrɒbəˈreɪʃn/ | 裏付け |
| evaluation/ɪˌvæljuːˈeɪʃn/ | 評価 |
| portfolio/pɔːtˈfəʊlɪəʊ/ | ポートフォリオ |
A shared result hides different contributions
- A fictional pupil team makes a library map. Mei drafts the legend, Arun checks the room labels, and Jo tests a draft with the librarian. A photograph shows all three holding the finished map. Does it establish who did each task?
- A contribution 贡献 is the part a person actually played. The finished map shows a shared result; an individual account needs a specific action and appropriate evidence. This classroom case is not a completed CAS experience.
メイ自身の貢献となる活動はどれか？
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
事例では、その3つのタスクを異なる生徒に割り当てている。
Show the decision in your work
- Mei's first draft uses three similar symbols. After the librarian reports confusion, Mei revises the legend with distinct symbols and labels. The two dated drafts make the change visible.
- A decision record 决策记录 explains why the change was made and what Mei did. Credit Jo for seeking the feedback and Arun for checking the labels. Mei cannot claim those tasks as her own.
チーム写真から、メイがすべてのタスクを完了したことが保証される。
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
共有された写真だけでは、各人の行動を確認することはできない。
Match evidence to the learning claim
- Mei says she learned to make instructions easier to follow. Her reflection should identify the initial difficulty, the feedback, her revision and what a later check showed. A draft change alone does not establish its effect on readers.
- Corroboration 佐证 can support a specific account through another person's relevant observation. A librarian's note about Mei explaining the new legend may support that action; it does not certify every learning outcome.
2つの日付付き下書きが最も直接的に裏付けているのは何か？
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
下書きは修正を可視化しており、その効果には適切な読者の証拠が必要である。
記録を、それが裏付けられる内容と対応させよ。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
すべての記録を同等に扱うのではなく、特定の主張に対する証拠を選択せよ。
Report mixed results honestly
- In the next approved trial, two readers identify the study rooms correctly, but one still confuses the lift and stairs symbols. The revision helped some readers while an important problem remained.
- An evaluation 评价 explains what the evidence changes in your judgement. Propose a relevant revision and another agreed check instead of claiming that the map now works for everyone.
どの結論が後の裁判に適合するか。
難易度 2/5 · 140 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
改善点と残っている困難の両方を報告せよ。
Keep evidence accurate and private
- A portfolio 学习档案 holds selected records of actual work and learning. Follow the school's approved process for drafts, feedback and permissions; avoid collecting or publishing unnecessary personal details.
- Only real approved action can support a record of an experience. Keep this invented case labelled practice. The school reviews authentic evidence and programme requirements; a quiz cannot confirm CAS completion.
このImplementedケースをどのように使用すべきか？
難易度 1/5 · 100 コイン + 今日初回完了時に小ボーナス付与
推論練習は実際の参加や学習成果を担保しない。
Mei can explain that feedback revealed confusing symbols, identify her own legend revision and credit her teammates' different roles. The dated drafts support the change. The later trial supports a limited improvement and identifies a remaining lift/stairs problem. A next action is to agree a clearer symbol with the librarian and test that distinction. This is a fictional practice explanation, not an actual portfolio entry.
Attendance or a team photograph does not by itself show a person's task or learning. An attractive final product can still have an unresolved problem.
Explain your own action, connect appropriate evidence to learning, credit others and use honest feedback to decide the next step.