Cash flows: the list is the craft
Diperkenalkan| English | Makna |
|---|---|
| incremental cash flow | incremental cash flow |
| opportunity cost/ɒpəˈtjuːnɪti kɒst/ | The value of the best alternative forgone when a choice is made. |
NPV is arithmetic on a list — the craft is the list
- Most valuation errors are cash-flow errors: the 8,000 architect fee included (sunk), the 4,000 stall profit missed (opportunity), festival capacity double-counted.
- The incremental cash flow 增量现金流 means: because of the project, after tax, in cash.
The three tests for every line
- Sunk: in both futures → never enters. Opportunity: the alternative forgone → always enters. Financing: in the DISCOUNT rate, not the flows.
- Depreciation is not cash — its only entry is the tax shield it creates.
In the list or out?
Route each item by the three tests - incremental, sunk, financing - and catch the tax and working-capital subtleties.
The founder says the 8,000 architect fee must push the NPV down. The correct reply?
Kesulitan 1/5 · 100 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
Sunk means gone at the decision moment. The rule is bookkeeping, not heartlessness.
The site kills 4,000 a year of stall profit for 5 years. At 8%, its present-value cost, to the nearest pound?
Kesulitan 2/5 · 140 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
A 4,000 five-year annuity discounted at 8% = 15,971 - the opportunity cost enters the NPV as a real deduction.
Loan interest belongs in the project cash flows.
Kesulitan 1/5 · 100 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
Financing costs live in the discount rate (the WACC of unit 5). Putting them in the flows double-counts them.
Match each item to its treatment.
Kesulitan 2/5 · 140 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
Three tests and one subtlety - the whole unit on four lines.
Cannibalisation and diverted capacity
- The Saturday crew earns 3,000 that would exist anyway → not incremental. The 1,200 of festival orders genuinely lost → in, negative.
- The net entry is −1,200: the test is always "does the cash change BECAUSE of the project?"
The Saturday crew would earn 3,000 anyway; 1,200 of festival orders are genuinely lost. The net entry?
Kesulitan 1/5 · 100 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
The 3,000 exists in both futures; the 1,200 changes because of the project. Because-of is the only test.
Depreciation 12,000 a year, tax 25%. The annual tax shield, in pounds?
Kesulitan 2/5 · 140 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
The shield = depreciation x tax rate = 3,000 of tax saved a year - the ONLY cash entry depreciation ever gets.
Working capital: 4,000 injected at year 0. The correct treatment?
Kesulitan 1/5 · 100 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
Cash moves when it moves: out at the build, back at the wind-down. Profit never sees it; the flow list must.
The single question that decides any borderline item is:
Kesulitan 1/5 · 100 koin + bonus kecil pada penyelesaian pertama hari ini
Because-of, after tax, in cash - the three words that build the list the NPV will judge.
Working capital moves too
- 4,000 injected at year 0 (inventory build) is an outflow; its recovery in year 5 is an inflow. Profit never sees the movement; cash does.
Three cash-flow slips
- Sunk or financing flows in the list. Both double count.
- Opportunity costs missed. The stall's 4,000 is a real cost.
- Accounting profit read as cash. Depreciation shelters tax, and that is all.
Recap
- Incremental = because-of, after-tax, in-cash.
- Sunk never, opportunity always, financing in the rate.
- Working capital enters when it moves, both ends.