Exam workshop: plan, answer and review
Plan a multipart answer
The report question below is worth six practice points for a complete algorithm. Before coding, list its identifiers and types. Separate storing entries from selecting entries, even if your implementation processes them in one loop. A record is appropriate because a code and a measured value have different types.
Marking checklist
Review each feature: record definition; correctly bounded array; reading every requested entry; inclusive threshold; output in input order; correctly initialised count and final output. A teacher may award partial marks for these features even when a runnable solution fails a case. Our local check awards the complete-algorithm points only when all cases pass.
Attempt, then compare
Try the algorithm without hints. Trace a value below the threshold, one exactly on it, and one above it. After checking, use the authored hints and worked answer to compare decisions. Explain why Code is a STRING and why Count is initialised outside the loop. When ready, attempt assessment A dan assessment B without support.
Read N (1 to 4), then Target, then N code/value pairs. Define TYPE Entry with Code : STRING and Value : INTEGER, and store an array of records. Output codes whose Value is at least Target, in input order, then the matching count.
Klik Jalankan untuk melihat output di sini.
For Target = 10 and values 9, 10, 15, give Count after each iteration. Count starts at 0 and increases for values at least Target.
Explain your choice of data structure and loop. Identify one boundary case and predict its result. For a subroutine, explain what is returned or changed in the caller.
Saved for this sitting on this browser. Review this yourself or with your teacher; these explanations are not automatically marked.
Review your explanation against these criteria
- My types and data structure match the data and the question.
- I justified the loop and checked its first and last iterations.
- Initial values and rejected operations preserve the intended state.
- My test includes input, purpose and expected result.
- I distinguished returning a value from printing and changing caller state.