התנתקות
הוצגA process, over a century
- The process of decolonisation occurred over the course of the century with varying degrees of cooperation, interference, or resistance from European imperialist states.
- Process and over the course of the century rule out treating decolonisation as an event.
- And the European role is described three ways — cooperation, interference, or resistance — with no default.
בחרו את שלושת היחסים האירופאים ש-CED מציין.
רמת קושי 2/5 · 140 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
ללא ברירת מחדל ביניהם.
Where the process starts
- 8.2 already named the overthrow of European empires among the shifts the First World War produced.
- 8.4's mandate system had altered the imperial balance of power rather than ending empire.
- So decolonisation begins inside the same century as the imperial intensification of 7.6, which is the point worth making.
'תהליך... לאורך המאה' מכשיר את ההתייחסות להתנתקות כ...
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
זהו לא רגע אחד, ולא סיפור אחד.
The colonised are the agents here
- The objective's wording is how colonial groups around the world sought independence from colonisers — the subject of the sentence is the colonised.
- 7.7 had already said imperial endeavours created resistance to foreign control abroad.
- So the resistance that empire produced is what this subtopic follows to its conclusion.
שיתוף פעולה אירופאי, התערבות או התנגדות?
מיינו כל יחס אירופאי כלפי עצמאות.
הנושא במשפט המטרה הוא...
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
העמים המושבים ביקשו עצמאות; ה-CED מצין זאת.
The CED gives Europe three postures with no default: cooperation, interference, or resistance. So there is no single story of how empires ended — an answer should give at least two of the three and say what made the difference in that case.
8.2 ציין כבר את נפילת האימפריות האירופיות כאחד מההשפעות מלחמת העולם הראשונה.
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
ולכן התהליך של עיבוד קולוניאלי מתחיל באותו מאה עם אינטנסיפיקציה אימפריאלית.
Varying degrees, not one story
- Some transfers of power were negotiated; some were resisted by force; some were interfered with after formal independence.
- The CED's three words cover all of those without ranking them or assigning them to particular states.
- So an answer should give at least two of the three and say what made the difference.
המבנה שסובייקט זה מעודד זוגות...
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
מה שמסביר מדוע אותה שיטה הביאה לתוצאות שונות.
Various ways, in the objective's words
- The objective is the various ways in which colonial groups sought independence — plural, and about method.
- So the answer describes how independence was sought, and the CED's three European postures explain why the same method met different outcomes.
- That pairing — colonial method against European posture — is the structure this subtopic rewards.
Two territories reach independence in the same decade. One does so through negotiation with a government that has decided the cost of staying is too high; the other after years of fighting. The claim being made was the same in both. The answer it met was not.
The process of decolonisation occurred over the course of the century with varying degrees of cooperation, interference, or resistance from European imperialist states. It is a process, not an event; it begins in the same century as 7.6's imperial intensification, with 8.2 already naming the overthrow of European empires; and its subject is colonial groups... sought independence, following 7.7's resistance to foreign control to its conclusion.