הסכם שהשביע רבים
הוצגTwo goals that could not both be met
- The conflicting goals of the peace negotiators in Paris pitted diplomatic idealism against the desire to punish Germany, producing a settlement that satisfied few.
- The CED locates the failure in the goals, not in the negotiators' competence.
- Satisfied few is its verdict, and few is not none — the settlement had defenders as well as enemies.
בחר שתי המטרות המתנגדות ש-CED מציין.
רמת קושי 2/5 · 140 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
הכשל טמון במטרות ולא במוסכים.
The mandate system redistributed empire
- The League of Nations distributed former German and Ottoman possessions to France and Great Britain through the mandate system, thereby altering the imperial balance of power and creating a strategic interest in the Middle East and its oil.
- Two consequences named: altering the imperial balance of power, and creating a strategic interest in the Middle East and its oil.
- So a body founded to replace power politics also carried out a transfer of empire.
Two incompatible aims, and the compromises each produced
הפסק דין של CED הוא הסכם שהשביע ____.
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
וגם 'רבים' אינו אף אחד — היו לו גם מגנים וגם אויבים.
Why it did not resolve the challenges
- Politically, it left a state punished but intact, and 8.6 names postwar bitterness among fascism's conditions.
- Economically, it did not repair the conditions 8.5's Great Depression would exploit.
- Diplomatically, it created an institution without the power to compel, and redistributed empire in the same act.
מטרה, תוצאה או השפעה מאוחרת יותר?
מיין כל אלמנט בהסכם השלום.
בחר שתי ההשלכות של מערכת המנדט ש-CED מציין.
רמת קושי 2/5 · 140 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
גוף שהוקם כדי להחליף את הפוליטיקה הכוחנית ביצע העברת אימפריה.
The CED locates the failure in the goals, not the negotiators. Their conflicting goals pitted diplomatic idealism against the desire to punish Germany, so any settlement had to disappoint one of them — which is why the CED's verdict is a settlement that satisfied few rather than one that was badly drafted.
התאם כל אתגר לסיבה שבה ההסכמה נכשלה בפתרונו.
רמת קושי 2/5 · 140 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
איך ולמה, בשלוש שורות.
Compare it with Vienna
- 5.7's Congress attempted to restore a balance and contain revolution, and 6.5 gave it an institution to do so.
- Paris attempted something harder: a settlement based on principle and on punishment at the same time.
- Naming the difference is the strongest single move available in this subtopic.
לעומת וינה, פריס ניסתה...
רמת קושי 1/5 · 100 מטבעות + בונוס קטן בהשלמה הראשונה היום
הגדרת ההבדל היא הצעד החזק ביותר כאן.
How and why it failed
- The objective is how and why the settlement failed to effectively resolve the political, economic, and diplomatic challenges.
- How: by producing terms that satisfied few and an institution without means of enforcement.
- Why: because the negotiators' goals conflicted, so any settlement had to disappoint one of them.
One party wants a settlement that no one has cause to overturn; another wants a settlement that makes one state unable to try. Every clause that serves the second weakens the first. The document that results is not a compromise; it is two documents in one binding.
The conflicting goals of the peace negotiators in Paris pitted diplomatic idealism against the desire to punish Germany, producing a settlement that satisfied few, and the League of Nations distributed former German and Ottoman possessions to France and Great Britain through the mandate system, thereby altering the imperial balance of power and creating a strategic interest in the Middle East and its oil. The failure lies in the goals, and it leaves postwar bitterness for 8.6 to build on.