IB Diploma Programme Music HL (first assessment 2022; 2020 guide). This topic equips PRESENTING MUSIC, the externally assessed collection of finished works (40% SL, 30% HL): programme notes, presenting as a creator (composition and/or improvisation) and presenting as a performer (solo and/or ensemble), demonstrating engagement with diverse material from the four areas of inquiry. This handout teaches the finished work, the two presenting strands and the programme notes. All worked examples are original.
Must-know for presenting music:
Family
Content
creator
composition and/or improvisation: the maker's work finished
performer
solo and/or ensemble: the player's work finished
notes
programme notes written for the listener, not the examiner
diversity
the works engage material from all four areas of inquiry
identity
finished works expanding musical identity and musicianship
3.2
Presenting as a creator
English
The creator's strand submits finished composition 作曲 and/or improvisation 即兴演奏: a piece brought to a state the student would sign. The discipline: the material's sources are diverse (drawn from the four inquiries), the choices are audible (a listener can hear the decision without being told), and an improvisation is presented as a rehearsed practice with its limits named, not as a lucky take.
Worked example. “Signal”, a ninety-second piano piece: a call motif borrowed from the analysed work song (the inquiry of expression), answered in the same part; the texture thins to one voice at the close, reversing the song's build; one improvised answer phrase in the final return, marked, rehearsed and freely timed.
The performer's strand submits finished solo 独奏 and/or ensemble 合奏 performing: the choice serves the music (a close that needs one player's control of time argues solo; a piece built on dialogue argues ensemble), the interpretation is a decision (tempo, voicing, where the accent falls) evidenced against the score or source recording, and the standard is the student's best finished work, not the hardest attempt.
Worked example, continued. “Signal” is presented solo: the single-voice close needs one player's time, and the call-and-response is handled inside one part; the interpretation holds the response line slightly late, reading the call as insistent.
The programme notes 节目说明 serve the audience's listening: what to hear (the texture thinning to one voice at the close), where the material came from (the work-song motif, named as source and study), and what the performer chose (the response held late). The failure modes: the biography essay (about the composer, not this listening) and the analysis dump (technical inventory with no guidance for the ear).
Worked example, concluded. The notes open inside the sound (“the piece begins with a call you will hear four times, each answer closer”), name the source in one sentence, and close with the listening instruction (“let the last answer arrive alone”).
Creator: composition and/or improvisation finished and signable (creator).
Performer: solo and/or ensemble, the choice serving the music (performer).
Notes for the listener: what to hear, the source, the choice (notes).
The works engaging all four inquiries' material (diversity).
The worked “Signal” presentation understood (worked).
Boundary notes: the examiner must see the music happening: engagement shown in the elements, the processes evidenced, the work finished. All worked examples are original.
Supported preparation: Resolved work and programme notes
Scope and prerequisites
IB music first assessment 2022. Work as researcher, creator and performer across personal/local/global contexts and four areas of inquiry: sociocultural/political expression; listening/performance; dramatic/movement/entertainment; electronic/digital age. School provides actual scores/audio and performance opportunities.
Mapped preparation outcomes: ib_music_hl.3.1, ib_music_hl.3.2. Read the matching native lesson first. Actual approved choices, evidence and final learner work remain separate.
Source vocabulary
programme notes 节目说明; improvisation 即兴演奏.
Explanation and worked method
Finished creating and performing work needs technical and expressive preparation plus actual evidence. Programme notes explain relevant context and intention; they do not replace a recording or establish that an intention succeeded.
Task: draft a note for the original phrase study, then identify what a reviewer must hear.
“The study compares a single line with a sustained lower part while retaining the four-note melody. Listen for how the added layer changes balance and harmonic reference.” A reviewer must hear actual versions, not just read this claim.
Independent transfer
The sustained C3 overwhelms the melody. Propose a practical revision and evidence of its effect.
Attempt independently before reading the model.
Checked original model
Reduce its level, change register or adjust articulation in an approved trial, keeping the intended harmonic role clear. Compare actual before/after recordings for audibility and balance, then justify the chosen version rather than merely claiming improvement in the notes.
These are authored formative expectations, not official IB descriptors. Accept other justified arguments with evidence and material limits.
Source and task holds
This supplement teaches the method for this part of the course. The full assessment criteria and any texts your school chooses come from your teacher.