English
AUTHORITARIAN STATES (20th century) — the most taught topic: rise (economic crisis, weak institutions, propaganda, violence), rule (political control, social policy, opposition) and impact, read through TWO states from different regions — the classic pairings: Hitler's Germany with Castro's Cuba; Mao's China with Mussolini's Italy. Core contentions: does the rise need crisis more than ideology, and does control rest on coercion 强制 more than consent?
CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF 20TH-CENTURY WARS — two world wars or a world war with a civil war; LONG-term (alliance systems, imperial rivalry, ideology), SHORT-term (crises, mobilisation) and TRIGGER causes distinguished, and effects measured politically (borders, regimes), economically (costs, reconstruction) and socially (demography, women's roles, memory). Classic pairing: the First World War with the Second.
THE COLD WAR: SUPERPOWER TENSIONS AND RIVALRIES — origins (ideology, security, power), development (crises from Berlin to Cuba; deterrence and the arms race; spheres and proxy wars), and end (economic failure, leadership, the revolutions of 1989–91), read through US–Soviet relations plus ONE regional case (classic: Korea, Vietnam, or Afghanistan).
The remaining topics kit briefly: SOCIETY AND ECONOMY (750–1400) and DYNASTIES AND RULERS (750–1500) — pre-modern states, trade and belief; SOCIETIES IN TRANSITION (1400–1700) and EARLY MODERN STATES (1450–1789), with expansion, absolutism, knowledge; CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF EARLY MODERN WARS (1500–1750); ORIGINS, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACT OF INDUSTRIALIZATION (1750–2005); INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENTS (1800–2000), studied through classic India with a Latin American case; EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC STATES (1848–2000) — liberal reform, suffrage, one democratic state's depth. Each supplies the same skeleton: two regions, one big question.
Worked example. A favourite Paper-2 question — “Discuss the view that authoritarian rule rested more on propaganda than terror” — is answered with the paired states: Germany's radio and rallies made a political religion, yet the Night of the Long Knives and the Gestapo's informant web answered dissent; Cuba's literacy campaign and symbolism coexisted with Committees for the Defence of the Revolution. The judgement: propaganda 宣传 manufactured consent; terror policed its boundary — the two were one system, but terror 恐怖 was the backstop that propaganda alone never was.